Just got back from seeing it... not really sure if i like it or not...
it was a definitely a break from the utopia that Roddenbery made... very dark...
i wont discuss spoilers... but it was a damn good movie... just not sure it was a star trek movie....
a couple of oddities i noticed.... in once scene, a cardassian drink is ordered... this owuld be almost a century before the events of DS9... also, the TOS cast is all present even though chekov didnt join the crew until the 2nd TOS season...
other than that, the special effects are top notch... the debris in space that gently float away from damaged areas of the ships are spot on... as is the lack of sound in space...
New Star Trek
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
New Star Trek
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: New Star Trek
to get an idea... imagine BSG and the omaha beach scene of saving private ryan combined with a star trek logo...
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- FelixEstrella
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:00 pm
Re: New Star Trek
Saw it too. Didn't really like nor dislike it, but I'm not a big Trek fan. One thing that did strike me as odd though; there seems to be a burgeoning love affair brewing between Uhura and Spock. WTF? Also, canyons in Iowa?
- randy
- Posts: 8354
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
- Location: EM79VQ
Re: New Star Trek
Not the last time I looked. Although as a Boy Scout many moons ago, I ran across gullies that seemed pretty steep and deep when trying climb out of them at the end of a 20 mile cross country hike. Especially in the rain.FelixEstrella wrote: Also, canyons in Iowa?
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
Re: New Star Trek
Well Ron Moore (from BSG) was a screenwriter, then add in J.J. Abrahms . . .mekender wrote:to get an idea... imagine BSG and the omaha beach scene of saving private ryan combined with a star trek logo...
Haven't seen it yet, but I am kind of surprised it isn't more a reboot.
Anyone else see the SNL bit on the movie? Pretty funny.
- Jeffro
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:17 pm
Re: New Star Trek
I liked it and thought it kicked ass.
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
Shane
Shane
- Aegis
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: New Star Trek
Well, if you watch the first season of the original series, you can definitely tell Uhura has the hots for Spock; though of course nothing ever comes of it.FelixEstrella wrote:...there seems to be a burgeoning love affair brewing between Uhura and Spock. WTF?
I loved the movie, myself.
Chicks dig fixed bayonets
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: New Star Trek
the stuff in the movie was quite obviously a mine... the walls were cut too precisely to be naturalrandy wrote:Not the last time I looked. Although as a Boy Scout many moons ago, I ran across gullies that seemed pretty steep and deep when trying climb out of them at the end of a 20 mile cross country hike. Especially in the rain.FelixEstrella wrote: Also, canyons in Iowa?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: New Star Trek
Ok my two biggest problems with the movie are:
1) The action scenes were so in your face that you never were really able to appreciate the level of detail that went into the filming of the movie... I just thought that things moved so fast that they were overwhelming... But that did tend to get your heart rate up...
2) They did a piss poor job of explaining how this was an alternate time line... The events leading up to the movie and the time line changes were significant, to see such drastic changes in what people know as star trek makes them very hard to swallow... A couple of more lines in dialogue during one of the scenes in the middle of the movie could have wrapped it up nicely and left the average viewer with little doubt as to what was happening... As it stands the only people that will understand how the time line works will be the die hard trekkies that actually read up on it... I feel that this will lead to a lot of the less hard core fans to dislike the movie...
Mild spoiler warning... More of a context helper for those that haven't read up on the movie as much as I have.
[spoiler]The time line that Spock comes from places him at approximately 9 years after the USS Voyager returned home from the Delta Quadrant. This would mean that he had been working diplomatically with the Romulans for close to 19 years starting with the events of the 5th season TNG episodes Unification I & II[/spoiler]
1) The action scenes were so in your face that you never were really able to appreciate the level of detail that went into the filming of the movie... I just thought that things moved so fast that they were overwhelming... But that did tend to get your heart rate up...
2) They did a piss poor job of explaining how this was an alternate time line... The events leading up to the movie and the time line changes were significant, to see such drastic changes in what people know as star trek makes them very hard to swallow... A couple of more lines in dialogue during one of the scenes in the middle of the movie could have wrapped it up nicely and left the average viewer with little doubt as to what was happening... As it stands the only people that will understand how the time line works will be the die hard trekkies that actually read up on it... I feel that this will lead to a lot of the less hard core fans to dislike the movie...
Mild spoiler warning... More of a context helper for those that haven't read up on the movie as much as I have.
[spoiler]The time line that Spock comes from places him at approximately 9 years after the USS Voyager returned home from the Delta Quadrant. This would mean that he had been working diplomatically with the Romulans for close to 19 years starting with the events of the 5th season TNG episodes Unification I & II[/spoiler]
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: New Star Trek
An interesting bit of trivia I found...
That is something I liked about the movie, the depth and grittiness of the engineering decks and shuttle bays... None of the TV shows ever showed the down and dirty side of the ship...The engineering section of the starship USS Enterprise was filmed at the Budweiser beer plant in Van Nuys, California. (J.J. Abrams interview, Jimmy Kimmel Live!).
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944