Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by First Shirt »

I guess I've never understood the fascination with two-stage triggers. I know most military rifles have them, and for training young recruits they make a certain amount of sense, I suppose.

But I've never liked them, and have always shot better with triggers that could be adjusted to provide minimum take-up and over-travel.

YMMV, JMHO, IRRDU.

Or, as Brother Dave Garner says "Everybody to his own kick!"
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by Weetabix »

slowpoke wrote:So what caliber did you order? 308?
Yes. Savage 16 FCSS

The name, "Weather Warrior," makes me cringe a bit, but I'll get over it. Maybe I'll just call it Jake or something. :D
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by Weetabix »

First Shirt wrote:Weet, I've got a couple extra mags that should fit that, although they are blued, not stainless. Let me know if you need one.
Email on the way.
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
PawPaw
Posts: 4493
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by PawPaw »

Weetabix wrote:
First Shirt wrote:Weet, I've got a couple extra mags that should fit that, although they are blued, not stainless. Let me know if you need one.
Email on the way.
The 10-round magazines for the Scout rifle iwll also fit your rifle. Call Savage and ask for the Part #110570, MAG BOX ASSY, SHORT, (10 ROUND)w/LOGO BUTTON. You might not want a 10-round magazine, but I bought a couple for mine, just for giggles.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by Weetabix »

Ooooh... 10>4. I'll check it out. Thanks!

The Savage store says to specify bottom or side release. Which is yours?

More mags is always better
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
PawPaw
Posts: 4493
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by PawPaw »

Weet wrote:The Savage store says to specify bottom or side release. Which is yours?
Mine is bottom release, as are all the new ones. I don't think they've made side release in a while, but they've still got to stock magazines for them.

ETA: I find it easiest to call Savage, with your serial number handy. They'll know exactly what you need.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by HTRN »

First Shirt wrote:You might be able to handle a 2-oz. trigger, but most folks need at least two lbs., and three lbs. is better. More important than weight is how clean it breaks, and how much take-up and over-travel it has.
Keep in mind that BR has as much in common with regular hunting rifles, as Top Fuel does with a commuter car. Yes both are automobiles, but that's where the similarity ends.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by First Shirt »

Like anything else, the more specialized it is, the less useful it is outside of its specialty.
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
D5CAV
Posts: 2428
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by D5CAV »

First Shirt wrote:I guess I've never understood the fascination with two-stage triggers. I know most military rifles have them, and for training young recruits they make a certain amount of sense, I suppose.

But I've never liked them, and have always shot better with triggers that could be adjusted to provide minimum take-up and over-travel.

YMMV, JMHO, IRRDU.

Or, as Brother Dave Garner says "Everybody to his own kick!"
I agree with Vonz because 90% of my shooting practice is on some military platform - M14, G3, AR15, etc.

I'm so used to 2-stage triggers that really good single stage triggers tend to mess me up - I have to really think about my trigger pull.

Of course, as you point out in your last post, there is no "one size fits all" solution. Different tools are optimized for different applications, and few of us have the time and skills to master many tools.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
User avatar
Lokidude
Posts: 2159
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:49 am

Re: Hunting/target rifle mfr/model - your opinions?

Post by Lokidude »

.308 and a bit of practice, you ought to be able to peg a Q target out to 600 or so.
workinwifdakids wrote: We've thus far avoided the temptation to jack an entire forum.

But what the hell.
Standing for Truth, Justice, and the American Way!
Post Reply