Active shooter NAS P-cola

This forum is for discussions on the noteworthy events, people, places, and circumstances of both the past and the present (note: pop culture etc... is on the back porch).
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by Termite »

One pilot called base security at NAS Pensacola and other Navy bases “mall cops,” because protection on the base has been outsourced to private security and many were “fat and out of shape.”
When we went to see Junior Termite's graduation at Paris Island, the security personnel consisted of USMC police carrying sidearms(9mms), and a handful of contractors carrying both M4s and sidearms. I noticed that 2 of the contractor's sidearms were Kimber customs.

The contractors looked like Blackwater/Aegis/etc operators to me.

“I have zero confidence the guy I show my ID card to at the gate could save me,” one pilot added. Fox News spoke to three Navy instructor pilots Tuesday.
It’s an opinion shared by many across the military, including the U.S. Army; more than a dozen soldiers and an unborn child were gunned down at Fort Hood in 2009.
“We trust 18-year-old privates in combat with grenades, anti-tank missiles, rifles and machine guns, but we let service members get slaughtered because we don’t trust anyone to be armed back here in the United States,” a senior U.S. Army officer told Fox News.
Why don't we have a military CCW system for service members at state-side bases? Train and vet service members who volunteer for it.
This ain't rocket surgery or brain science........ :roll:
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by g-man »

Termite wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:52 am
Why don't we have a military CCW system for service members at state-side bases? Train and vet service members who volunteer for it.
This ain't rocket surgery or brain science........ :roll:
Because that would make sense, which is by regulation not authorized. I have a civilian CCW. I have never shot anything other than expert on pistol quals. I am a field grade officer with clearance, and a military driver’s license which allows me to drive LMTVs with more than a dozen Soldiers in the back, but me carrying a piece on base is an anathema to leadership. I have plenty of friends at work who are Armor and Aviation officers who at some point had access to tanks and helicopters with 120mm main gun rounds, or hellfire missiles... But no 9mm, because reasons.
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by Vonz90 »

g-man wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:34 am
Termite wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:52 am
Why don't we have a military CCW system for service members at state-side bases? Train and vet service members who volunteer for it.
This ain't rocket surgery or brain science........ :roll:
Because that would make sense, which is by regulation not authorized. I have a civilian CCW. I have never shot anything other than expert on pistol quals. I am a field grade officer with clearance, and a military driver’s license which allows me to drive LMTVs with more than a dozen Soldiers in the back, but me carrying a piece on base is an anathema to leadership. I have plenty of friends at work who are Armor and Aviation officers who at some point had access to tanks and helicopters with 120mm main gun rounds, or hellfire missiles... But no 9mm, because reasons.
Because it makes some people’s jobs potentially more difficult. Easier to say no,

We had a base commander back when I was active who tried to ban all personally owned firearms even though there are specific DOD policies saying he could not. A bit of a pissing contest later and he lost, but that is the mindset that a significant minority has.
User avatar
g-man
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by g-man »

True, but this implies that those same senior leaders don’t trust their MPs/SPs to execute judgement when they roll up on a scene where a couple of Os/SNCOs have perforated an active shooter...

It’s a minority, but it’s the minority that got promoted by making risk averse decisions.
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
User avatar
scipioafricanus
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:08 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by scipioafricanus »

https://www.foxnews.com/us/letter-navy- ... d-on-bases
Dozens of U.S. Navy pilots have written a letter demanding Capitol Hill lawmakers and top military brass allow more pilots to carry arms on bases, and allow those standing watch at flight schools across the country to be armed in the wake of the deadly shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola by a Saudi officer training there.

The letter, obtained exclusively by Fox News, is a form letter the pilots hope their colleagues will use to write lawmakers to get what they say is much-needed attention — preventing further shootings on U.S. military bases, in part by increasing deterrence.
If there is a Stairway to Heaven, is there an Escalator to Hell?
If God wanted men to play soccer, he wouldn’t have given us arms. - Mike Ditka
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by Vonz90 »

Vonz90 wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:31 pm
g-man wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:34 am
Termite wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:52 am
Why don't we have a military CCW system for service members at state-side bases? Train and vet service members who volunteer for it.
This ain't rocket surgery or brain science........ :roll:
Because that would make sense, which is by regulation not authorized. I have a civilian CCW. I have never shot anything other than expert on pistol quals. I am a field grade officer with clearance, and a military driver’s license which allows me to drive LMTVs with more than a dozen Soldiers in the back, but me carrying a piece on base is an anathema to leadership. I have plenty of friends at work who are Armor and Aviation officers who at some point had access to tanks and helicopters with 120mm main gun rounds, or hellfire missiles... But no 9mm, because reasons.
Because it makes some people’s jobs potentially more difficult. Easier to say no,

We had a base commander back when I was active who tried to ban all personally owned firearms even though there are specific DOD policies saying he could not. A bit of a pissing contest later and he lost, but that is the mindset that a significant minority has.
Some would prefer they not be armed either.

On my deployment to the NAG in 2003/4; the Commodore we reported to when attempted to order all of his units to not issue arms or ammo to anyone unless we went to alert, including not loading the machine guns on the boats. Keep in mind we were the only seaward force protection for the harbors and there was an actual shooting war going on. (He lost on this point because there was a general order for the theater that his order violated, but the fact he tried showed he was unfit for the job, plenty of other things did too.)
Precision
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by Precision »

g-man wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:34 am

On my deployment to the NAG in 2003/4; the Commodore we reported to when attempted to order all of his units to not issue arms or ammo to anyone unless we went to alert, including not loading the machine guns on the boats. Keep in mind we were the only seaward force protection for the harbors and there was an actual shooting war going on. (He lost on this point because there was a general order for the theater that his order violated, but the fact he tried showed he was unfit for the job, plenty of other things did too.)

Just showed he was qualified to be a bullet stopping device, but barely even that.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: Active shooter NAS P-cola

Post by Termite »

Way back in the day, circa 1983 - 1995, I was most always armed, when on active duty. As an E-4/5, and later as a W-1/2/3....

CCW means concealed. It really doesn't matter what the O-6/7/8 thinks about it.

Just sayin'......... 8-)
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
Post Reply