8 shot for the J frame, and 10 shot in the N frame.
Mainly, it'll be for new shooters/perhaps for doing some steel challenge. Any thoughts on the two?
22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:14 pm
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
I have a 4" 10 shot 617, but it's an [strike]L frame[/strike] (er, no, K frame, but it's similar in size and weight to the L frame 686. Full underlug, heavy.). I love it.
The main downside is, it's heavy. But that also makes it very steady, and reduces recoil to really negligible levels. So the weight isn't purely a downside. Well except if you're carrying it all day.
I'd like to try a J frame plinker, but never have.
Just guessing here, but I'd probably prefer the J frame as a trail gun for fun while hiking, and the bigger one at the range.
The main downside is, it's heavy. But that also makes it very steady, and reduces recoil to really negligible levels. So the weight isn't purely a downside. Well except if you're carrying it all day.
I'd like to try a J frame plinker, but never have.
Just guessing here, but I'd probably prefer the J frame as a trail gun for fun while hiking, and the bigger one at the range.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:14 pm
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame
-
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:59 pm
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:02 am
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
I picked up a nice plinker a little while back. Heritage Rough Rider single action. Fun little 6 shooter that came with 2 cylinders for .22lr and .22 magnum. Took it to the range twice so far. A fair amount of fun for 200 bucks.
-
- Posts: 1840
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 am
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
My Dad had an H&R Sportsman 999, 9-shot top break. It was quite accurate, and a very fun gun, and I learned to shoot a handgun with it.
Unfortunately it was stolen by a 'caregiver' and so far not recovered; when time allows I'm going to try and find another.
Unfortunately it was stolen by a 'caregiver' and so far not recovered; when time allows I'm going to try and find another.
- HTRN
- Posts: 12403
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation.MarkD wrote:617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame

HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
So you're on record as a fan of the single-shot revolver.HTRN wrote:In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation.MarkD wrote:617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame

Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
-
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:59 pm
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
I get that you're kidding, but it's not uncommon for people who use revolvers for Bullseye to figure out which of their Chambers throws a flyer and use the other five. I never got good enough that it mattered.Greg wrote:So you're on record as a fan of the single-shot revolver.HTRN wrote:In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation.MarkD wrote: 617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.
- HTRN
- Posts: 12403
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame
Another common trick is to chase all the holes in the cylinder with a reamer the thinking is that any tight chambers will be opened up..
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt