Question for the Navy types
-
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm
Question for the Navy types
What is the structure that sticks out over the screws on ships like this? LINK
- Steamforger
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:41 pm
Re: Question for the Navy types
Stern and Propeller Guards. These days shrouds are more the norm. In addition to protecting the screw there's also an increase in efficiency in lower speeds and a decrease in efficiency in higher speeds. High or near static thrust can be potentially doubled, but this is highly dependent on the gap between the shroud and the screw.
Basically, good for tugs and large, massive vessels like ferries, submarines, and cargo carriers, but bad for small craft and high speed stuffs. IIRC, Aircraft carriers do not use them.
ETA for wonky stats and mis-remembered numbers. If you really like I can break out Milwee and get wrapped around the axle. Fascinating book, BTW.
Basically, good for tugs and large, massive vessels like ferries, submarines, and cargo carriers, but bad for small craft and high speed stuffs. IIRC, Aircraft carriers do not use them.
ETA for wonky stats and mis-remembered numbers. If you really like I can break out Milwee and get wrapped around the axle. Fascinating book, BTW.
Last edited by Steamforger on Fri Jun 26, 2015 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm
Re: Question for the Navy types
so that lattice work is just there to protect the screws?
- Vonz90
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Re: Question for the Navy types
Old style "cruiser" sterns were narrow so a twin screw ship would have the props sticking well out to the side, so if you bumped into something (or vice verse, like a tug boat) you could damage the screw rather easily. This was not a problem for single screw ships because it would be at the centerline.Cobar wrote:so that lattice work is just there to protect the screws?
Modern transom stern ships are much wider in back so there is no issue with the props poking out the side because the stern is well up on both sides.
-
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm
Re: Question for the Navy types
Ok, so like fenders over a tire. Thanks always wondered about them.
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: Question for the Navy types
I believe there was some utility of them being able to protect against things like depth charges falling off the wrong part of the stern too since the Wickes Class did have a single track for rolling the off back there.
From the looks of it they all had them till the Faragut class
From the looks of it they all had them till the Faragut class
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- Jericho941
- Posts: 5190
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am
Re: Question for the Navy types
Well yes, DDs up through the 1930s also had really narrow sterns.mekender wrote:I believe there was some utility of them being able to protect against things like depth charges falling off the wrong part of the stern too since the Wickes Class did have a single track for rolling the off back there.
From the looks of it they all had them till the Faragut class