The Force Awakens

Everything cultural, pop or otherwise. Books, movies, music, comics, poetry, random cultural geekery.
User avatar
slowpoke
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:09 pm

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by slowpoke »

skb12172 wrote:I think it was Lucas.
It was. Is lucas still making movies?
"Islam delenda est" Aesop
User avatar
Kommander
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Kommander »

i read somewhere that it would be best if these new movies were either awesome or awful. If they are awesome then we get a few more good star wars movies. If they are awful, well that's what Rifftrax and Red Letter Media are for. Anyway haven't watched the trailer let so let me take a look.

Hmm, well at least they managed to make storm troopers actually look threatening again.
Aesop
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Aesop »

Lucas sold everything, lock, stock, and barrel, to The Mouse around Halloween 2012.
Took a sack of cash, left the keys to his empire on Bob Iger's desk.

Disney pointedly solicited Lucas' input for the upcoming final trilogy, while keeping the reins firmly in their own hands as far as final decisions.
Which is to say they want Lucas happy and on-board with the new films, but business is business, and they paid handsomely (to the tune of >$4B) for the right to do things the way they see fit.

That being said, if Han Solo loses the Millenium Falcon in a poker game at the end of the first installment to, say, Johnny Depp playing some intergalactic Cap'n Jack Sparrow, things could get epic.
If they try to cross the streams with Avengers or somesuch, it could get all kinds of AVP-stupid.

It's going to come down to whether or not they've actually got a coherent story.
Abrams proved he could only pull off 1 Star Trek movie in a row before losing his mind, so this is still up in the air.
Notable by their absence in the tease was the merest glimpse of Hamill, Ford, or Fisher.
And I predict lens flare.
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
User avatar
Lokidude
Posts: 2159
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:49 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Lokidude »

Jericho941 wrote:Everything looks good except that light saber.
Why not? A saber is an incredibly personal item, especially for a Sith. I'm all down with the light-claymore.
workinwifdakids wrote: We've thus far avoided the temptation to jack an entire forum.

But what the hell.
Standing for Truth, Justice, and the American Way!
User avatar
Darrell
Posts: 6586
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:12 pm

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Darrell »

Aesop wrote: Notable by their absence in the tease was the merest glimpse of Hamill, Ford, or Fisher.
There are several short clips on Youtube purporting to be the official trailer. One of them does list Hamill, Ford, and Fisher, and shows Ford as a much older Han Solo. Here it is:

http://youtu.be/6RsQd7hn9bg

Looks like Max Von Sydow is also in the movie. Now that's interesting, IMO. But is it real?
Eppur si muove--Galileo
User avatar
scipioafricanus
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:08 pm

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by scipioafricanus »

There is also something with Lucas still having a say on the dvds or something? That is why they haven't released the original trilogy on Blu-ray unaltered like millions of people remember. Kind of sad to realize that many people don't know those without Lucas's changes to them. And for that matter a time when there were only 3 great movies rather than 6 (3 being crap ones).

SA
If there is a Stairway to Heaven, is there an Escalator to Hell?
If God wanted men to play soccer, he wouldn’t have given us arms. - Mike Ditka
User avatar
Dub_James
Posts: 3833
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:20 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Dub_James »

Darrell wrote:
Aesop wrote: Notable by their absence in the tease was the merest glimpse of Hamill, Ford, or Fisher.
There are several short clips on Youtube purporting to be the official trailer. One of them does list Hamill, Ford, and Fisher, and shows Ford as a much older Han Solo. Here it is:

http://youtu.be/6RsQd7hn9bg

Looks like Max Von Sydow is also in the movie. Now that's interesting, IMO. But is it real?

That's a mixture of other movies and video games, such as Destiny, and also Ender's Game.
Oh, the heads that turn
Make my back burn
And those heads that turn
Make my back, make my back burn

-She Sells Sanctuary
The Cult
User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Jericho941 »

Lokidude wrote:
Jericho941 wrote:Everything looks good except that light saber.
Why not? A saber is an incredibly personal item, especially for a Sith. I'm all down with the light-claymore.
Supposedly that character isn't a Sith, just a Sith fanboy with a home brew saber.

And it looks really, really dumb. Like, "please destroy my laser sword by hitting my crossguard (unless it's built out of super-rare saber-proof materials) before I hurt myself" dumb.
User avatar
Kommander
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by Kommander »

I noticed the cross guard too. Also the plasma or whatever looks rather ragged. The cross guard is not a bad idea, just having it mounted on protrusions like that would not work well.
JohnOC
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:46 pm

Re: The Force Awakens

Post by JohnOC »

I recall a lot being said about the double end lightsaber bo-staff being a good way to lose limbs.. The movie (that shall not be named) still managed to make it look awesome. (Would have been even cooler if Maul had chopped Jarjar into giblets.)

I'm cautiously optimistic.

Have the video game Old-republic stuff been pitched out of the canon as well? There are saber-proof materials used as starter weapons in those. Dunno how rare they might be by the time of the trilogies though.
The government that is big enough to give you everything you want, is powerful enough to take everything you have. – Thomas Jefferson
Post Reply