National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

The place to talk about personal defense, preparedness, and survival; both armed and unarmed.
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by 308Mike »

From NRA-ILA:
[center]National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry[/center]

Friday, December 05, 2008

The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), through the National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, has announced the final amended version of its changes to rules on carrying of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. DOI’s move will restore the rights of law-abiding gun owners who wish to transport and carry firearms for lawful purposes on most DOI lands, and will make federal law consistent with the state law in which these public lands are located. NRA led the effort to amend the existing policy regarding the carrying and transportation of firearms on these federal lands.

“Today’s announcement by the U.S. Department of the Interior brings clarity and uniformity for law-abiding gun owners visiting our national parks,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox. “We are pleased that the Interior Department recognizes the right of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families while enjoying America's National Parks and wildlife refuges.”

DOI announced the rule change today and will publish the new regulations in the Federal Register. The new regulations allow right-to-carry permit holders to exercise their Second Amendment rights on national park and wildlife refuges in those states that recognize such permits. The move will provide consistency across our nation’s federal lands and put an end to the patchwork of regulations that governed different lands managed by different federal agencies. In the past, Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands allowed the carrying of firearms, while lands managed by DOI did not.

NRA has long held that amendments to those regulations were needed to reflect the changed legal situations with respect to state laws on carrying firearms. Earlier this year, fifty-one U.S. Senators sent a strong bipartisan letter to the DOI supporting the move to make state firearms laws applicable to national park lands and refuges.

“These changes respect the Second Amendment rights of honest citizens as they enjoy our public lands,” concluded Cox. “We applaud the Interior Department’s efforts to amend these out of date regulations.”
I moved this from Politics & Law to here and left a shadow in place in the other forum so it shows up in both without there being two instances of the same post.

EDIT:

Here's the Department of Interior's Press Release:
Date: December 5, 2008
Contact: Chris Paolino
202-208-6416

[center]Interior Announces Final Firearms Policy Update[/center]

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Lyle Laverty today announced that the Department of the Interior has finalized updated regulations governing the possession of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. The final rule, which updates existing regulations, would allow an individual to carry a concealed weapon in national parks and wildlife refuges if, and only if, the individual is authorized to carry a concealed weapon under state law in the state in which the national park or refuge is located. The update has been submitted to the Federal Register for publication and is available to the public on www.doi.gov.

Existing regulations regarding the carrying of firearms remain otherwise unchanged, particularly limitations on poaching and target practice and prohibitions on carrying firearms in federal buildings.

“America was founded on the idea that the federal and state governments work together to serve the public and preserve our natural resources,” Laverty said. “The Department’s final regulation respects this tradition by allowing individuals to carry concealed firearms in federal park units and refuges to the extent that they could lawfully do so under state law. This is the same basic approach adopted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS), both of which allow visitors to carry weapons consistent with applicable federal and state laws.”

On February 22, 2008, Interior Secretary Kempthorne responded to letters from 51 Senators, both Democrats and Republicans, as well as from the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, urging him to update existing regulations that prohibit the carrying of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. In his response, the Secretary directed Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Lyle Laverty “to develop and propose for public comment by April 30 Federal regulations that will update firearms policies on these lands to reflect existing Federal laws (such as those prohibiting weapons in Federal buildings) and the laws by which the host states govern transporting and carrying of firearms on their analogous public lands.”

Changes in the final regulations from those originally proposed in April were developed as the result of public comments. In particular, comments expressed concern about the feasibility of implementing regulations which directly linked the carrying of concealed firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges to the ability of an individual to carry a concealed firearm on analogous state lands. The final regulations remove that potential logistical hurdle.

The existing regulations, as currently in effect, were adopted in 1981 for national wildlife refuges and in 1983 for national parks. Since that time many states have enacted new firearms policies. Currently, 48 states have passed legislation allowing for the lawful possession of concealed weapons.

“The Department believes that in managing parks and refuges we should, as appropriate, make every effort to give the greatest respect to the democratic judgments of State legislatures with respect to concealed firearms,” said Laverty. “Federal agencies have a responsibility to recognize the expertise of the States in this area, and federal regulations should be developed and implemented in a manner that respects state prerogatives and authority.”

[center]— DOI —[/center]
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
Ben Rumson
Posts: 1400
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:22 am

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Ben Rumson »

This a great victory for all permit holders and 2A rights organizations.. Strength in numbers and the squeaky wheel gets the grease and all that. This would not have been possible without the overwhelming email and phone call campaigns.

Get loud and let your voice be heard. We must continue to shout down the few that tried to keep this from happening. GET INVOLVED AT THE LOCAL AND NATIONAL LEVEL!

I'll get off my soap box now. :P
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Netpackrat »

The final rule, which updates existing regulations, would allow an individual to carry a concealed weapon in national parks and wildlife refuges if, and only if, the individual is authorized to carry a concealed weapon under state law in the state in which the national park or refuge is located.
Which is a huge step forward, and a nice Christmas present from GWB on his way out, but what about weapons that can't be concealed? After all, I am far more concerned about 4 legged predators in our parks than the 2 legged ones.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Flintlock Tom
Posts: 2323
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:41 am
Location: Oregon

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Flintlock Tom »

and what about open carry in states that allow it?
If time, chance and random process can produce a platypus why not an ammo tree?
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by mekender »

far as ive seen, it is concealed only...


and worse, this can be undone by an executive order on jan 21st if so desired.
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Weetabix »

So I was ahead of my time last August...

:roll:
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by mekender »

http://www.doi.gov/issues/Final%20Rule.pdf

i dont know for sure, but it repeatedly says "concealed" and "concealed handguns"
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Termite »

mekender wrote:....and worse, this can be undone by an executive order on jan 21st if so desired.
Maybe not.
The park rule will be published in the Federal Register next week and take effect 30 days later, well before Obama takes office Jan. 20. Overturning the rule could take months or even years, since it would require the new administration to restart the lengthy rule-making process.
From here.

Of course, that's the AP's opinion...... :roll:
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Netpackrat »

On page 17 of the pdf, they specifically boned people who need to carry a long gun for protection from large predators. Fortunately, the park that I regularly visit is one of the "new" parks where the right to bear arms has been preserved under ANILCA.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: National Parks to Allow Right-to-Carry

Post by Termite »

Netpackrat wrote:On page 17 of the pdf, they specifically boned people who need to carry a long gun for protection from large predators. Fortunately, the park that I regularly visit is one of the "new" parks where the right to bear arms has been preserved under ANILCA.
Sounds like an excuse to buy that .480 Ruger to me....... ;)
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
Post Reply