Dirty Books

Keep it clean people, this is almost a family friendly site
User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: Dirty Books

Post by Jericho941 »

Greg wrote:The person I went to school with who writes romance novels. As for the demographics of romance readers, and their buying habits, that's everything I've ever read about the subject, from a wide range of sources.
Weird. My sources are similar (a friend who's a published author, etc) and they don't take kindly to plagiarism. It's not about churning out the same novel with different names, it's about theft, and when they get caught, it's occasionally hilarious.

But I guess that just comes down to different experiences.
Windy Wilson wrote:There's always been hack writing and the good stuff. These complaints about the derivative nature of Fifty Shades of Gray and the Twilight Series are also re-runs,
Except that's not it. Twilight is stupid, boring, and terrible, but it's actually pretty original. Fifty Shades of Grey is Twilight, only the names have been changed to protect the legally liable. Oh, and some sex thrown in by someone who has a poorer understanding of how it works than your average Catholic schoolgirl.

I guess in short, Twilight is Twilight, and Fifty Shades is Twilight but worse. Think Edward stalking Bella was romantic? Then try Fifty Shades of Grey, where [strike]Edward[/strike] Christian stalks [strike]Bella[/strike] Ana personally, electronically, and using a private investigator! And essentially kidnaps her while she's drunk off her ass! Ladies, don't you wish your husband was a dangerous dreamboat like him?
Fifty Shades of Gray was young adult literature for people who had graduated from high school. Hardy Boys for sexually active girls.
Eh, the main demographic's a bit older. It's "mommy porn," erotic literature for housewives too embarrassed to buy actual romance novels.

Other than that? It's really a book with nothing for everyone. The oft-touted BDSM? Not even researched, so people who are into it won't get anything out of it at best (or will be horrified at how wrong it is). The story? Mostly bland filler designed to bridge between repetitive sex scenes. Seriously, they're all "he starts to move, really move, and I explode all around him" with some blather about her "inner goddess" for some reason. They're so boring that even the author starts skipping them halfway through the second novel. So it's not even delivering if you're after porn. Interesting characters? None. Ana is even more of a stupid blank than Bella, and despite how often everyone keeps telling her how smart and independent she is, she's the exact opposite. Christian is just some rich jerk who gets off on hitting people and controlling every aspect of their lives, and everyone else is just incidental.

Its success is really quite baffling. It's not fun, interesting, cathartic, or (and the worst sin for porn) remotely erotic. It's like... Gordon Ramsey's reaction to shark fin soup. "It tastes of nothing." And on top of that, it basically glorifies domestic abuse. I just don't get it.
Aesop
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am

Re: Dirty Books

Post by Aesop »

I think you're overlooking the obvious:
This says a lot more about Belgian library patrons than about any book, even an execrably dopey example like 50 SoG.

The people who read books from the public library there, clearly, are a bunch of STD-ridden coke freaks who spend so much money on blow (in both a pharmaceutical sense, and a prostitutional reference), that they obviously can't afford the cover price of a trashy piece of pulp soft-core pseudo-porn so bad that even the leather afficiando types mock it. (Y'all can do your own internet research there, I'm on the company computer. 8-) )
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14007
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Dirty Books

Post by Netpackrat »

I find the fact that you guys are still discussing the nuances of romance/porn "literature" to be mildly disturbing.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Yogimus
Posts: 4922
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am

Re: Dirty Books

Post by Yogimus »

Why can't folks jerk off to nancy drew, like normal people?
Cobar
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm

Re: Dirty Books

Post by Cobar »

Yogimus wrote:Why can't folks jerk off to nancy drew, like normal people?
:lol:

You always give me a good laugh, Yogi, thanks.
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Dirty Books

Post by HTRN »

Netpackrat wrote:I find the fact that you guys are still discussing the nuances of romance/porn "literature" to be mildly disturbing.
Not really - it's because it's a new subject, not one we've endlessly beaten to death, so the fact that they're wringing all they can out of it isn't surprising.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Post Reply