Vote Mark D in 2012

Discussions about our lives, families, jobs... things may get a little personal
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by Weetabix »

Probably not. But is should. And then we'd have more justification for shooting them.
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by First Shirt »

I wonder if one could make the case that felonious conduct while in office constitutes a violation of the oath of office, and therefore treason?

Maybe if taking a bribe was a hanging offense, they'd cut that shit out.
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by 308Mike »

Weetabix wrote:Probably not. But is should. And then we'd have more justification for shooting them.
It won't, not at all, you need to understand the way they think. They ALREADY believe they're our betters and worth far more than what they're being paid. Raising their pay to $3 million a year will only confirm their superiority feelings, enlarge their already super-inflated egos and create much more hostile (and possibly violent) elections.

Do you REALLY think someone like Cynthia McKinney wouldn't think she isn't worth at least TWICE that amount?

Image Image
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
Dub_James
Posts: 3833
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:20 am

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by Dub_James »

SoupOrMan wrote:
Dub_James wrote:
SoupOrMan wrote:With a nod to the Upright Citizens Brigade, I'd also install a Hot Chicks Room.
We wouldn't be happy if you didn't 8-)
What's wrong with a Hot Chicks Room? Warren G. Harding did it!
Sorry, I wasn't clear; I was saying we'd be unhappy if you didn't build it.

Roll on the chick room! :lol:
Oh, the heads that turn
Make my back burn
And those heads that turn
Make my back, make my back burn

-She Sells Sanctuary
The Cult
User avatar
Mud_Dog
Posts: 1223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:21 am

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by Mud_Dog »

Dub_James wrote: Sorry, I wasn't clear; I was saying we'd be unhappy if you didn't build it.

Roll on the chick room! :lol:
No, you wrote it right(sort of, english scholars would hit you though) since it was a double negative.
Obamalypse, Part II: The Armening. (-NPR)
User avatar
workinwifdakids
Posts: 3594
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:57 am

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by workinwifdakids »

Would you be ready to RULE on day 1, though?
And may I say, from a moral point of view, I think there can be no justification for shoving snack cakes up your action.
--Weetabix
User avatar
Rumpshot
Posts: 3998
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:56 am

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by Rumpshot »

HTRN wrote:If they must be paid, it should be tied directly to census data. They should get EXACTLY what the average american makes, which, last time I looked, was about 42,000.
HTRN
Close, but you need it to reflect what their constituents average. Some would get more, many would get much less.
NRA Life Member
VFW Life Member
NMLRA Field Rep
North Central Arizona
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by HTRN »

OOOOooohh, that's an even better idea!


HTRN
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by Weetabix »

Mike,

It doesn't matter how many times I see those pictures, I never become immune. I laugh every time I see them.

:lol:
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
MarkD
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: Vote Mark D in 2012

Post by MarkD »

Wow, I ignore a thread I started and someone posts a picture of the Green party candidate, someone pass the memory-bleach.

I don't have a problem with elected officials being paid, even paid well, for what they do. Like brain surgeons and proctologists, they (theoretically) do a job not many people could do or would want to do and it's a job that (arguably) needs to be done. No one complains when the exectutives of successful companies make lots of money, only when they make lots of money and the company fails due to incompetence or graft. The CEO makes a lot more than the guy who empties the wastebaskets, but there are a lot more capable wastebasket-emptiers than there are CEOs who can run a company successfully.

Both words in parentheses in the paragraph above are the problem, right now anyone lacking in ethical values COULD do the job our elected officials do, and most of those jobs don't need to be done as much as they are.
Post Reply