BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Discussion of all things technological and/or gadgety
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Aglifter »

Perhaps, slightly, heavier than air to make them more controllable in foul weather...

Some kind of auto-gyro like device for use as urban transport...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
User avatar
Cybrludite
Posts: 5048
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Cybrludite »

For what the military uses them for? No way, no how.

In civilian use, given the current state of our helium reserves? Unlikely. Now, make an envelope capable of maintaining a decent vacuum in the lift cells and is cheaper & safer than running a helo? That has possibilities for applications that don't require the helo's speed.
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King

"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Aglifter »

That was what I was thinking - The military needs the speed too much - I was thinking more for the folks who are taking them only a few miles, usually, (say from Newark Airport to Manhattan), etc.

Or, as I so often dreamed of, stuck in Houston traffic - or Austin traffic, which is worse - when I only needed to go a few miles, but had to allow an hour...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
tfbncc
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:00 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by tfbncc »

The problem with airships is that they cannot carry a passenger load/cargo large enough to justify the cost.

Back in the 80's, The Navy was looking at dirigibles as a possible long term ASW, open ocean radar and search platform. It was planned to be used against drug smugglers in the Caribbean and along both coasts. A single dirigible with a 2 section crew could stay aloft for up to two weeks at a time. While feasable, it never really got past the panning stage.
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Greg »

Aglifter wrote:That was what I was thinking - The military needs the speed too much - I was thinking more for the folks who are taking them only a few miles, usually, (say from Newark Airport to Manhattan), etc.

Or, as I so often dreamed of, stuck in Houston traffic - or Austin traffic, which is worse - when I only needed to go a few miles, but had to allow an hour...
It would seem awfully tempting for a short range runabout. Cost would tend to restrict it to a vip air taxi, though.

Seems to me the main practical issue is simply size. Good rule of thumb is air is a bit over 1kg/m3. So a bouyancy cell to balance just the weight (even pure vacuum for maximum lift for a given size) of a vip, personal assistant and luggage would be on the order of the size of a railcar. Not counting vehicle structure, propulsion, fuel, etc etc.

Advances in materials science, to allow larger, lighter, stronger structures might make big "industrial" lifter airships practical for say freight hauling or such, but that only works if you can scale the vehicle size up. Lighter than air doesn't work on a small scale.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
User avatar
MiddleAgedKen
Posts: 2873
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Flyover Country

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by MiddleAgedKen »

...and another dream of a career as an airship pirate shattered. Dang it all.
Shop at Traitor Joe's: Just 10% to the Big Guy gets you the whole store and everything in it!
User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Jericho941 »

I just want to know if my "massive zeppelin UAV carrier" makes any sense whatsoever.
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Greg »

Jericho941 wrote:I just want to know if my "massive zeppelin UAV carrier" makes any sense whatsoever.
With current structural materials? Probably not.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
User avatar
Yogimus
Posts: 4922
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by Yogimus »

I think it might. If the UAV-s are also dirigibles.
tfbncc
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:00 am

Re: BIT:dirigibles as helicopter replacements

Post by tfbncc »

On the other hand...

airship house
Post Reply