Man Defends Home with M44

The place to talk about personal defense, preparedness, and survival; both armed and unarmed.
User avatar
Catbird
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Catbird »

That's a welder's apron he's wearing. I'm sure it's to protect him from muzzle flash.
"If at first you don't succeed, that's one data point." XKCD
User avatar
Combat Controller
Site Admin
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Combat Controller »

WTF? I had to go watch it after those comments. He is certainty... resplendent.

Just goes to show, don't fuck with a guy wearing a sarong.

I hope those kids learned just like I hope the Homies in Question from my little incident learned that some folks are more badass than your punk ass and willing to ventilate you to prove it.
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Jered »

They only have to think you're crazy...
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by HTRN »

esa5444 wrote:The man had a 5 shot bolt action rifle. There were 12 kids.
For lack of a better term, I call it "lethal math".

Yes, it's a 5 rd gun and there were 12 of them. THat means a minimum of 7 that you can't shoot(discounting the bayonet). Problem is, who's gonna volunteer to get a lead injection? Ever seen the often used scene in the movies where the bad guy and his minions have the hero surrounded, Bad guy points out the lethal math, and orders them to "get him!". Hero responds by saying yup, he'll run out of bullets fairly quick, and then promptly shoots one of the mooks(the best is when they get shot in the face :lol: ) and then quip "WHO'S FIRST?" :twisted:
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
User avatar
Catbird
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Catbird »

It's a safe bet that these disadvantaged yoots didn't know the capacity of the rifle that was being pointed at them. It's also a safe bet that they knew, at least instinctively, that a rifle can do a lot more damage than a handgun.

I don't know if the gentleman had the bayonet extended. I'm not sure if I would. It would definitely up the intimidation factor quite a bit, but it would make the weapon unwieldly in a close-quarters urban environment. The Mosin-Nagant pattern rifles do make excellent clubs though.
"If at first you don't succeed, that's one data point." XKCD
User avatar
Frankingun
Posts: 1925
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:03 am

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Frankingun »

But, but, but. The Bradys say that guns don't prevent crime!

Anyhow, the brown of the apron fully clashed with his tank top, sarong, and combat boots. I will probably be dressing like that in less than ten years. :ugeek:
Buy ammunition and magazines.

You'll shoot your eye out!

Another blog.
User avatar
Windy Wilson
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:32 am

Re: Man Defends Home with M44

Post by Windy Wilson »

Was he a little guy with a smile and a big rifle? That's more scary than a big guy with a frown and a little gun. :D

I remember reading about a Texas Ranger explaining Lethal Math to a mob that wanted his prisoner. He had two pistols in shoulder holsters, and said he'd likely get 6 or 7 before they got him, but who among them would want even those odds?

Besides, who knows? Our hero with the M44 and the sarong might have been able to get 2 or more with a single bullet.
The use of the word "but" usually indicates that everything preceding it in a sentence is a lie.
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
Post Reply