today's Schlock- sig worthy
- SoupOrMan
- Posts: 5697
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
I'm still surprised that after all these years that Schlock hasn't gone up against an enemy who looks at him as a problem to be solved first with a higher-output plasma gun.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
- SoupOrMan
- Posts: 5697
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
It took a few days, but I went through the entire archive. That's a fun read from end to end.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:19 pm
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
I'm surprised that Schlock didn't force his way into the security armor of the guard whose face plate he shattered...... though that may be coming.....SoupOrMan wrote:I'm still surprised that after all these years that Schlock hasn't gone up against an enemy who looks at him as a problem to be solved first with a higher-output plasma gun.
"All somebody has to do to get along peacefully with me is leave me and mine alone. They open the door to violence, they've got no right to complain if more than they bargained for walks through."
- Mud_Dog
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:21 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
Took me about a week when I read the first post here! I wonder why I never got into it before? Maybe I just put it off to the side & forgot about it.SoupOrMan wrote:It took a few days, but I went through the entire archive. That's a fun read from end to end.
Oh well, that's been rectified, daily read now!
Obamalypse, Part II: The Armening. (-NPR)
- HTRN
- Posts: 12403
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
Uhm, wow. That's over 4000 strips.SoupOrMan wrote:It took a few days, but I went through the entire archive.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
- SoupOrMan
- Posts: 5697
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
4000 strips and a new-found desire to play Traveller... roll for survival!HTRN wrote:Uhm, wow. That's over 4000 strips.SoupOrMan wrote:It took a few days, but I went through the entire archive.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
- SoupOrMan
- Posts: 5697
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
So let me see if I have this correct: Flinders wanted to leave the Toughs after finding out about their altered memories on the off chance that she might have been manipulated into into doing so by someone in the UNS government. Legs and Schlock decide to kill her in Shep's house instead of just letting her leave, and Shep's mother provides her an escape route. Schlock chases Flinders, Flinders blasts Schlock into tiny bits and dumps him into a bunch of separate waste bags to slow him down. Flinders changes her appearance and scent to further hinder search efforts by the Toughs, and makes it back to the bus to find that it's being broken into by local criminals. The criminals turn out to be Professor Pau's henchmen, they capture Flinders, and she stalls for time until she can get the jump on Max. She kills Max, breaks out of the bus just the Toughs are coming into the docking bay and makes off with their stuff. Meanwhile, Schlock has captured Professor Pau and gotten his butt handed to him by a bunch of armored goons. Flinders saves Schlock, Ennesby and potentially Shep by killing the goons. Schlock is about to kill Flinders when she bribes him with Genuine Imitation Ovalkwik.
So, was Schlock trying to kill her over the potential security threat issue, thinking that she'd broken the contract or the fact that she schooled him with a firehose? Seriously, he's losing his touch if she's not dead by the end of the week.
So, was Schlock trying to kill her over the potential security threat issue, thinking that she'd broken the contract or the fact that she schooled him with a firehose? Seriously, he's losing his touch if she's not dead by the end of the week.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
So, I called it a month in advance.Greg wrote: Nah. With those words (the ones I spoiler'ed out) Katherine announced she was unquitting, making her no longer eatable. In fact, she probably just self-recruited.

There were bad feelings toward Katherine from the last mission, when she was one of the "bad guys". They hired her for the current mission out of necessity, and didn't trust her. When she broke the contract was when Schlock decided to eat her (remember the bad feelings from the previous mission?). The firehouse made it personal.SoupOrMan wrote:So, was Schlock trying to kill her over the potential security threat issue, thinking that she'd broken the contract or the fact that she schooled him with a firehose? Seriously, he's losing his touch if she's not dead by the end of the week.
The 7/31 and 8/1 strips were Katherine unbreaking the contract, earning some gratitude points, and showing that she has what it takes to be a Tough (between the timely arrival, willingness to stack the corpses like cordwood, good shooting, and big barrels of Ovalkwik).
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
- SoupOrMan
- Posts: 5697
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am
Re: today's Schlock- sig worthy
He should have tried eating her in front of a judge. He broke the contract from the company's end by not doing so.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds