Question for the Navy types

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
Post Reply
Cobar
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm

Question for the Navy types

Post by Cobar »

What is the structure that sticks out over the screws on ships like this? LINK
User avatar
Steamforger
Posts: 2785
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:41 pm

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by Steamforger »

Stern and Propeller Guards. These days shrouds are more the norm. In addition to protecting the screw there's also an increase in efficiency in lower speeds and a decrease in efficiency in higher speeds. High or near static thrust can be potentially doubled, but this is highly dependent on the gap between the shroud and the screw.

Basically, good for tugs and large, massive vessels like ferries, submarines, and cargo carriers, but bad for small craft and high speed stuffs. IIRC, Aircraft carriers do not use them.

ETA for wonky stats and mis-remembered numbers. If you really like I can break out Milwee and get wrapped around the axle. Fascinating book, BTW.
Last edited by Steamforger on Fri Jun 26, 2015 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cobar
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by Cobar »

so that lattice work is just there to protect the screws?
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by Vonz90 »

Cobar wrote:so that lattice work is just there to protect the screws?
Old style "cruiser" sterns were narrow so a twin screw ship would have the props sticking well out to the side, so if you bumped into something (or vice verse, like a tug boat) you could damage the screw rather easily. This was not a problem for single screw ships because it would be at the centerline.

Modern transom stern ships are much wider in back so there is no issue with the props poking out the side because the stern is well up on both sides.
Cobar
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by Cobar »

Ok, so like fenders over a tire. Thanks always wondered about them.
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by mekender »

I believe there was some utility of them being able to protect against things like depth charges falling off the wrong part of the stern too since the Wickes Class did have a single track for rolling the off back there.

From the looks of it they all had them till the Faragut class
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: Question for the Navy types

Post by Jericho941 »

mekender wrote:I believe there was some utility of them being able to protect against things like depth charges falling off the wrong part of the stern too since the Wickes Class did have a single track for rolling the off back there.

From the looks of it they all had them till the Faragut class
Well yes, DDs up through the 1930s also had really narrow sterns.
Post Reply