Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
DougWojtowicz

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by DougWojtowicz »

Barry needed to have been evacuated.

(And yes, I know that when a person is evacuated, they give him an enema. He needs the shit pumped out of him.)
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by mekender »

DougWojtowicz wrote:Barry needed to have been evacuated.

(And yes, I know that when a person is evacuated, they give him an enema. He needs the shit pumped out of him.)
I'm not sure there is a swimming pool big enough to hold it all.
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by 308Mike »

mekender wrote:
DougWojtowicz wrote:Barry needed to have been evacuated.

(And yes, I know that when a person is evacuated, they give him an enema. He needs the shit pumped out of him.)
I'm not sure there is a swimming pool big enough to hold it all.
I can find a hole big enough, but just barely. Check out the monster mine truck at the red arrow:
Russian Pit Mine 002_x700.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
Steamforger
Posts: 2785
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:41 pm

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by Steamforger »

Spells
Oh please. The USSS is obviously concerned about somebody shooting the candidate, since that historically exactly how they are killed, and everybody does in fact know that. Somebody displaying a gun is clearly going to be considered a potential threat. You are being intellectually dishonest.
Yes, it is obvious. Blatantly obvious. Terribly obvious. Mr Obvious obvious. What is less so is a particular threat called in, or uncovered, for that rally in that state that would have had the USSS at a higher level of situational awareness than typical for a presidential candidate rally. As for the rest, I feel Mekender's investigative skills have pretty much said what I was going for. Thanks Mekender!

I've been a lot on this board (some of it not good, especially in Katrina's aftermath), in this iteration, and in the past, but I've never been dishonest. I'll thank you to keep it civil.
Well done. Next he should argue he has the right to leave IEDs in front of W's motorcade.
Don't really know what to say about this one. It's quite a leap going from open carry to planting IEDs. :?
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by Jered »

Gee. What a way for obama to prove he doesn't want to take people's guns if he comes out in support of this guy.

Of course he won'.t
:roll:
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
User avatar
FastRope71
Posts: 1032
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:56 pm

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by FastRope71 »

DougWojtowicz wrote:Barry needed to have been evacuated.

(And yes, I know that when a person is evacuated, they give him an enema. He needs the shit pumped out of him.)

Nah, Doug. He's skinny enough as it is. Imagine what that 120 lb guy would look like with 80 lbs of crap removed.
If you are unwilling to give another man freedom in his life, do not expect to have it in your own.
It surely beats trying to figure out what the metrosexuals want ( a good hard kick in the nuts in my opinion, but that won't sell ice cream :D )- Highspeed
Cobar
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by Cobar »

Instead, Berosh said, it’s a battle between two constitutional rights: The right to bear arms and the right to assemble peaceably and without fear.
Did I miss an entire amendment?
DougWojtowicz

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by DougWojtowicz »

FastRope71 wrote:
DougWojtowicz wrote:Barry needed to have been evacuated.

(And yes, I know that when a person is evacuated, they give him an enema. He needs the shit pumped out of him.)

Nah, Doug. He's skinny enough as it is. Imagine what that 120 lb guy would look like with 80 lbs of crap removed.

Think "Olsen Twin."
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by Aglifter »

If the secret service didn't charge him w. anything, he didn't get near Mao's reincarnation -- I have accidentally been in a place where the secret service decided they didn't want me. I wasn't there very long. (They had decided that our club meeting was too close to where Laura Bush's helicopter was going to land...)

This looks much more like either some school yard bully behavior by the PA Cops involved, or is setting up to be a free speech case -- getting arrested for "disturbing the peace" while being politically active has been a common theme throughout our history.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
User avatar
MiddleAgedKen
Posts: 2873
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Flyover Country

Re: Arrest at Obama rally sparks gun rights debate

Post by MiddleAgedKen »

So thanks to this idiot, the argument moves from people's right to defend themselves and their property to people's right to display guns around Presidential candidates, and that is not a winnable debate. Well done. Next he should argue he has the right to leave IEDs in front of W's motorcade.
An argument (for given values of "argument") worthy of Cathy Lanier.
Shop at Traitor Joe's: Just 10% to the Big Guy gets you the whole store and everything in it!
Post Reply