Here's the list. Fire Away!
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/top ... _tanks.htm
Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
- skb12172
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am
Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.
- g-man
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
Korean tank listed at #2 should be listed as an honorable mention vs. being on the list, as while it is a 'production vehicle', the fact that they had to close the paragraph with "So it should enter service with the South Korean Army soon." means it isn't really fielded.
Really, most of the list falls under this exception. Production tanks on order get trumped by STRYKERs, Bradleys... MRAPS... pretty much anything that's actually fielded. Just sayin.
Really, most of the list falls under this exception. Production tanks on order get trumped by STRYKERs, Bradleys... MRAPS... pretty much anything that's actually fielded. Just sayin.
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
- HTRN
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
I agree, and even then, its till not quite as good as the abrams.g-man wrote:Korean tank listed at #2 should be listed as an honorable mention vs. being on the list, as while it is a 'production vehicle', the fact that they had to close the paragraph with "So it should enter service with the South Korean Army soon." means it isn't really fielded.
Really, most of the list falls under this exception. Production tanks on order get trumped by STRYKERs, Bradleys... MRAPS... pretty much anything that's actually fielded. Just sayin.
Was he challenger on the list? If not it should be.
I doo think the new leopard is arguably the the best MBT in the world right now, at least until the a3 abrams comes out..
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
- Jericho941
- Posts: 5180
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
Honestly this generation of tanks is pretty boring, comparison-wise. The prototypes are, well, prototypes.
It's not.
Honestly, of all the tanks on this that're actually in service proper, the Merkava has least business being on it.
All ammunition unloaded. I don't think people realize just how little room the Merkava has for this, and as a result it has a reputation as an APC with an MBT gun.All Merkava series tanks have a rear compartment which can be used to carry troops and cargo under armor. It can carry up to 10 troops when ammunition is unloaded.
It's not.
Honestly, of all the tanks on this that're actually in service proper, the Merkava has least business being on it.
- Jered
- Posts: 7859
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
They sure like Russian tanks. The T-90 is basically an updated T-72, and the Armata doesn't seem to run right.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
- Rod
- Posts: 4824
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:08 pm
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
Sheesh, looking down the list, my feeling is that the number 1 tank should be the Abrams. It's the only tank that's actually been in combat. Did you notice also that tanks are beginning to be like automobiles, every one looks nearly the same. Of course that's because of experimentation and design. Certain things just work better.
one can be a Democrat, or one can choose to be an American.
Good acting requires an imagination; reality requires a person not getting lost in their imagination.
"It's better to have a gun if you need it". Felix's opthamologist
Good acting requires an imagination; reality requires a person not getting lost in their imagination.
"It's better to have a gun if you need it". Felix's opthamologist
- HTRN
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
No, the a7 is better, due to newerLeopard fcs, a longer main gun, and much bettter armor in top surfaces, something the A2 Abrams is notoriously short on., and is especially worrying due to proliferation of top attack, man portable ATGW, especially from Russia. Dont worry, the A3 Abrams is in the development cycle right now.Rod wrote:Sheesh, looking down the list, my feeling is that the number 1 tank should be the Abrams. It's the only tank that's actually been in combat.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
- Vonz90
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
The M1 obviously has a lot more, but the leopard 2 have seen combat in Afghanistan and the Turks have used them against ISIS, possibly including some tank to tank ops for the Turks.
- D5CAV
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
Also need to look at number produced. 100 Korean tanks make those about as common as Bugatti Veyron roadsters. Even if you are an active duty cavalryman, you have a better chance of seeing a Veyron in the parking lot at a shopping mall than meeting a Korean K2 Black Panther tank on the battlefield.
My top 5 list would be:
Leopard 2 Mk 7
Abrams M1A2/A3
Whatever the Russians are using for their latest MBT
Whatever the Chinese are using for their latest MBT
LeClerc (not really enough production volume to make the list, but it's a pretty good tank on paper)
The Challenger is too heavy for it's powerplant (typical British design) so whatever the production numbers (even less than the LeClerc), it fails.
After that, I don't care. I'm not sure why the Koreans and Japanese bother with building their own tanks. Their numbers are so small, it's like the 1960's Swiss tanks (about 200 beautifully produced, overpriced tanks). After that disaster, the Swiss got smart and bought Leopard 2s.
My top 5 list would be:
Leopard 2 Mk 7
Abrams M1A2/A3
Whatever the Russians are using for their latest MBT
Whatever the Chinese are using for their latest MBT
LeClerc (not really enough production volume to make the list, but it's a pretty good tank on paper)
The Challenger is too heavy for it's powerplant (typical British design) so whatever the production numbers (even less than the LeClerc), it fails.
After that, I don't care. I'm not sure why the Koreans and Japanese bother with building their own tanks. Their numbers are so small, it's like the 1960's Swiss tanks (about 200 beautifully produced, overpriced tanks). After that disaster, the Swiss got smart and bought Leopard 2s.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- skb12172
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am
Re: Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
Asian Pride. That's why.
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.