Nuclear Fallout and Food Contamination

The place to talk about personal defense, preparedness, and survival; both armed and unarmed.
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: Nuclear Fallout and Food Contamination

Post by 308Mike »

mekender wrote:IIRC, water does a really good job of insulating against radiation...

advice i remember from WAY back was that double walled containers with water in the middle of the walls would get rid of almost all penetrating radiation...
HOW MUCH water?
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: Nuclear Fallout and Food Contamination

Post by mekender »

from wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallout_shelter
* Gaps in the shielding can be blocked using water cans, such as bottles of water. While water only has a density which is one tenth that of lead, it is still able to absorb gamma rays.
i never said it was ideal, but i have seen more than one reference to it working
Last edited by mekender on Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: Nuclear Fallout and Food Contamination

Post by Aglifter »

At one time I knew how to answer that -- from what I recall, though, it would be much easier to put up a sufficient amount of lead in a house than water...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
User avatar
Cybrludite
Posts: 5048
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am

Re: Nuclear Fallout and Food Contamination

Post by Cybrludite »

Either the Radiac Calculator, ABC-M1A1 is very optimistic about nuclear fallout decay rates, or I was overly pessimistic about the chances of survival in that scenario. Assuming for the sake of simplicity the fallout was from a single detonation and arrived all at once one hour after the explosion, you'd be looking at 40 RADs at 12 hours, and less than 70 at the two week mark. (With a dose rate off the bottom of the chart inside your inner refuge.) In the basement itself, things would be more in line with my prediction with about 200 RADs at the 12 hour mark and close to 350 by two weeks. (The LD50 is currently held to be at 450 RADs.) Outside (assuming the planning factor of a .1 transmission rate into a basement is correct) the LD50 would be reached within 45 minutes, so my thoughts on making a break for it would have been a very, very bad idea indeed. :oops:

By the two week point, you're looking at about .95 RAD/Hr outside.
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King

"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
Post Reply