316 stainless

The place for general talk about gun, shooting, loading, camping, survival, and preparedness related tools and gear, as well as gear technology discussion, gear reviews, and gear specific "range reports" (all other types of gear should be on the back porch).
Post Reply
User avatar
PawPaw
Posts: 4493
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm

316 stainless

Post by PawPaw »

Scrap steel from a local manufactory. My buddy claims that it's 316 stainless and so hard that they have to use special tools just to deal with it.

Image

Has anyone ever used this stuff for target material? I"m going to hang it out at the 100 yard line and see how it does.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
User avatar
skb12172
Posts: 7310
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am

Re: 316 stainless

Post by skb12172 »

Snort...enjoy your ricochet. :lol:
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.
User avatar
bubblewhip
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: 316 stainless

Post by bubblewhip »

IMO with my experience in knives, hardness isn't what you want in a target ment to be shot at as hard stainless steels are much more shock prone than equally hard or softer carbon steels. I would expect chipping if not total catastrophic failure if you shot at it if it is as hard as they say it is. Still it is all theory, the only way to find out is to shoot at it. Depends on how thick the disc you got is as well, and it might hold up if it was adequately thick.
User avatar
PawPaw
Posts: 4493
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: 316 stainless

Post by PawPaw »

skb12172 wrote:Snort...enjoy your ricochet. :lol:
I'm not worried about ricochets. Any risk can be managed, and while a steel target might ricochet a bullet, it's my experience that when a standard cup-and-core bullet hits a flat steel plate, it comes apart. Not a ricochet at all, but the bullet itself fails spectacularly with lead splatter and total jacket destruction. What I am interested to see if if this steel will hold up to the impact or whether it will fail.
bubblewhip wrote:I would expect chipping if not total catastrophic failure if you shot at it if it is as hard as they say it is.
Yeah, that's the issue. Still, as you say, the only way to find out is to shoot it. I'll try to remember to take pictures and post an update when that happy event occurs.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: 316 stainless

Post by Termite »

316 stainless isn't that terribly hard, around 95 on the Rockwell B scale. It's used widely offshore.

That's about a $80-$90 target, D.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: 316 stainless

Post by HTRN »

It's not that hard, it's slightly more rust resistant than 304 because of the slightly higher Nickel content, and oh, IT FRIGGIN' WORK HARDENS IF YOU LOOK AT WRONG. :evil:
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
User avatar
Combat Controller
Site Admin
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am

Re: 316 stainless

Post by Combat Controller »

If it doesn't chip it should work harden from all the impacts!
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.
Post Reply