TFB review of Ruger Redhawk .45acp/.45LC.

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: TFB review of Ruger Redhawk .45acp/.45LC.

Post by Greg »

Jered wrote:
toad wrote:Well I guess I'll stick with my "new" Zastava M-57 Tok clone. The Wolf 7.62X25mm hollow points supposedly puts out 450 ft. lbs.. If I miss center of mass at car jacking range, I figure I'll still burn of their eyebrows.

Added: I fergot I don't have a car anymore.
From what I've seen of it, the Zastava CZ-999 is a good piece, too. I've got one, and it seems well made, but I haven't shot it yet.
Any opinions on the Zastava CZ99 rifle? I might wind up giving some out as presents.....
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: TFB review of Ruger Redhawk .45acp/.45LC.

Post by Jered »

I'd buy one and shoot it to see. I quick google search showed an extraction issue:

https://www.preciseshooter.com/blog/zastava99.aspx
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Post Reply