Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
User avatar
Frankingun
Posts: 1925
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:03 am

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Frankingun »

Let's quit insulting each other, first of all.

And while leaving a briefcase on the front seat of your car in a parking lot is akin to a lithe model in a rubber miniskirt at a biker bar, the blame for the expected robbery or rape lies both with the possessor of the briefcase and/or miniskirt for making a bad decision, as well as the lowlife who took advantage of the situation.
Buy ammunition and magazines.

You'll shoot your eye out!

Another blog.
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Netpackrat »

Frankingun wrote:Let's quit insulting each other, first of all.

And while leaving a briefcase on the front seat of your car in a parking lot is akin to a lithe model in a rubber miniskirt at a biker bar, the blame for the expected robbery or rape lies both with the possessor of the briefcase and/or miniskirt for making a bad decision, as well as the lowlife who took advantage of the situation.
You can make a totally valid point that wearing slutty clothes, or leaving valuables in sight is stupid, but a criminal is 100% responsible for his criminal acts. There was a time when society understood this, but evidently the cultural phenomenon of coddling criminals, and/or making excuses for their behavior, has pervaded a lot farther than I had thought.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Yogimus
Posts: 4922
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Yogimus »

Netpackrat wrote:
Frankingun wrote:Let's quit insulting each other, first of all.

And while leaving a briefcase on the front seat of your car in a parking lot is akin to a lithe model in a rubber miniskirt at a biker bar, the blame for the expected robbery or rape lies both with the possessor of the briefcase and/or miniskirt for making a bad decision, as well as the lowlife who took advantage of the situation.
You can make a totally valid point that wearing slutty clothes, or leaving valuables in sight is stupid, but a criminal is 100% responsible for his criminal acts. There was a time when society understood this, but evidently the cultural phenomenon of coddling criminals, and/or making excuses for their behavior, has pervaded a lot farther than I had thought.
Criminal is 100% responsible for being a criminal.

That little factoid isn't going to keep your guns being stolen.

Victim taking responsibility and not volunteering to be a victim just might, in the future.
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Netpackrat »

Yogimus wrote:Criminal is 100% responsible for being a criminal.

That little factoid isn't going to keep your guns being stolen.

Victim taking responsibility and not volunteering to be a victim just might, in the future.
That's a lot more reasonable. Saying somebody is stupid or a volunteer is a far cry from wanting to have the victim charged with a crime.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Darrell
Posts: 6586
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:12 pm

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Darrell »

When did "locks are for honest people" become a thing? :roll:
Eppur si muove--Galileo
User avatar
Yogimus
Posts: 4922
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Yogimus »

Netpackrat wrote:
Yogimus wrote:Criminal is 100% responsible for being a criminal.

That little factoid isn't going to keep your guns being stolen.

Victim taking responsibility and not volunteering to be a victim just might, in the future.
That's a lot more reasonable. Saying somebody is stupid or a volunteer is a far cry from wanting to have the victim charged with a crime.
Losing a firearm due to negligence shouldn't be free. You are providing arms to a criminal element.
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Netpackrat »

Yogimus wrote:Losing a firearm due to negligence shouldn't be free. You are providing arms to a criminal element.
The guy is out several valuable collectible revolvers, including family heirlooms. Plus, people all over the world think he is an idiot. Doesn't sound like his negligence was free, to me.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Yogimus
Posts: 4922
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Yogimus »

Might just be the military in me.
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by Termite »

Yogimus wrote:Might just be the military in me.
The military, at least the Army, only truly considers personal weapons(rifle/handgun/etc) "properly secured" if they are locked in a company arms vault. Or on your person, but using deadly force to prevent theft of your weapon is not(or wasn't) authorized(outside a combat zone).

Additionally, the Army was infamous for putting soldiers on guard duty with rifles......and no ammo. Which is, IMHO, criminal negligence and depraved indifference to the health and welfare of it's soldiers.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
PawPaw
Posts: 4493
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Texan loses collection of mint Colts in Ohio

Post by PawPaw »

Yogimus wrote:Might just be the military in me.
I hear ya. For eight of my last 10 years in uniform, I was considered the local subject-matter expert on what we called Change 2 to AR 190-11, Physical Security of Arms, Ammunition and Explosives. I spent a good portion of my time advising commanders on physical security of arms and ammunition. Proper doors on arms rooms, motion detectors, levels of intrusion-resistance, etc, etc, ad infinitum, ad nauseum. I was never so happy in my life to leave the purgatory of being a staff-rat and go back to a field battalion.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
Post Reply