Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
Post Reply
User avatar
Darrell
Posts: 6586
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:12 pm

Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by Darrell »

Huh. I wonder if this would make the SP-101 obsolete--Ruger is coming out with a 3" barreled version of the LCR revolver, in .38 +P:

http://www.ruger.com/products/lcr/models.html

Also, looking at the list, they make an LCR in 9mm. I didn't know that.
Eppur si muove--Galileo
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by First Shirt »

Y'know, if they'd make that in an 8-shot .22LR, it would be just about the perfect tacklebox gun. (I know they already make an SP-101 in that configuration.)
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
slowpoke
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:09 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by slowpoke »

First Shirt wrote:Y'know, if they'd make that in an 8-shot .22LR, it would be just about the perfect tacklebox gun. (I know they already make an SP-101 in that configuration.)
Your joking right?
cause they already make it in the snubbie:
http://ruger.com/products/lcr/specSheets/5410.html
"Islam delenda est" Aesop
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by First Shirt »

Yeah, I know they make it in a snubbie, but I'm talking about an exposed-hammer, 3-inch bbl, adjustable sights version that weighs about as much as a Whopper with cheese.

The alloy frame should make it as corrosion-resistant as stainless, right?
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by Netpackrat »

First Shirt wrote:The alloy frame should make it as corrosion-resistant as stainless, right?
The things they have to do to aluminum to make it stronger, almost always make it corrode more easily.

OTOH, in order for stainless steel to be strong enough for a firearm frame, they can only put just so much chromium in it (stainless in general is much softer/weaker than carbon steel), which is why a lot of "gun" stainless, is not as "stainless" as say a marine grade of SS would be.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by First Shirt »

Thanks, I did not know that. Knew that "stainless" is a pretty flexible term, but didn't realize that about aluminum.
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6113
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by Weetabix »

I've read that the recoil is punishing, even for people who don't mind recoil. Will the longer barrel help that?
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
slowpoke
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:09 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by slowpoke »

Weetabix wrote:I've read that the recoil is punishing, even for people who don't mind recoil. Will the longer barrel help that?
Funny I find it much more pleasant to shoot than a J frame.
"Islam delenda est" Aesop
Rusty Ray
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:01 pm

Re: Ruger LCR w/3" Barrel

Post by Rusty Ray »

Just took a look at the gat.

Does the price include a fake walky talky and a pair of plastic handcuffs?

Rusty
Post Reply