Reliability vs. Accuracy

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
User avatar
SoupOrMan
Posts: 5696
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am

Re: Reliability vs. Accuracy

Post by SoupOrMan »

Yeah, but then he'll want a Python. Mint. With parts that will never wear out because they're made of an alloy of Unobtanium and pixie farts (for complete frictionless movement of parts). Also, as it's a .357 Magnum that's going into a Colt, the cartridges will have to be made using earth dug from Samuel Colt's grave, forged in the fires of Mount Etna, and quenched with the tears of Elmer Keith. Then, he shall load them one by one, the cartridges being handed to him by a beautiful woman who has been ritually blinded specifically for this purpose so that she may not be forever transfixed by gazing upon her reflection in the pure nickel finish. Then, and only then shall he take aim at his foes (be they of mortal flesh or immortal cardboard), shoot like crap and blame it on the gun.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."

“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
User avatar
MiddleAgedKen
Posts: 2873
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Flyover Country

Re: Reliability vs. Accuracy

Post by MiddleAgedKen »

SoupOrMan, I'm gonna need a new keyboard and monitor. I'm pretty high-maintenance, so send me a shoebox full of twenties at my Gettysburg address.
Shop at Traitor Joe's: Just 10% to the Big Guy gets you the whole store and everything in it!
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: Reliability vs. Accuracy

Post by 308Mike »

SoupOrMan wrote:Yeah, but then he'll want a Python. Mint. With parts that will never wear out because they're made of an alloy of Unobtanium and pixie farts (for complete frictionless movement of parts). Also, as it's a .357 Magnum that's going into a Colt, the cartridges will have to be made using earth dug from Samuel Colt's grave, forged in the fires of Mount Etna, and quenched with the tears of Elmer Keith. Then, he shall load them one by one, the cartridges being handed to him by a beautiful woman who has been ritually blinded specifically for this purpose so that she may not be forever transfixed by gazing upon her reflection in the pure nickel finish. Then, and only then shall he take aim at his foes (be they of mortal flesh or immortal cardboard), shoot like crap and blame it on the gun.
Yeah, but for all the money you just made off his ass, who's gonna' care? :lol:

When he gets to the point he quits paying and keeps bitching, tell him to take his business elsewhere.
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
SoupOrMan
Posts: 5696
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am

Re: Reliability vs. Accuracy

Post by SoupOrMan »

Yeah, but we have to blind an attractive woman for the task. That's not cool, man.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."

“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
Post Reply