Man arrested for allegedly beating brother to death in San Diego
Posted: 02/20/2014
Last Updated: 2 hours ago
SAN DIEGO - A Minnesota man was arrested Thursday for allegedly beating his younger brother to death at their father's home in northern San Diego County.
Michael Young, 56, confronted his 51-year-old sibling, Robb, about 6:30 a.m. Wednesday about being too noisy at the house in the 1700 block of Victoria Way in San Marcos, according to sheriff's officials.
An argument led to a fistfight that wound up in the front yard, Lt. Glenn Giannantonio said.
Eventually, Michael Young stopped brawling and went back inside, leaving Robb Young on the ground. About 40 minutes later, Michael Young went to check on his brother and found he was not breathing, the lieutenant said.
Michael Young tried to resuscitate his younger brother, then flagged down a passing motorist and asked her to call 911. The woman's husband and paramedics also tried to help, but Robb Young was declared dead at a hospital.
An autopsy showed the victim died of blunt-force injuries to his head.
Michael Young was arrested Thursday on suspicion of voluntary manslaughter, Giannantonio said. The brothers were visiting their father when the fight broke out.
Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
- 308Mike
- Posts: 16537
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm
Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
Linkarooni to a local story (no doubt he's likely traumatized about killing his brother, but that doesn't mean his brother isn't still dead):
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON
A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.
I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.
I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
- PawPaw
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm
Re: Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
Well, yean, you can beat a man to death. Every cop is taught those places you don't hit, simply because hitting them increases the risk of death or great bodily harm. Chart here (.pdf alert) In that chart, which is used for baton training, green is an okay strike zone, yellow is "iffy", and red denotes a greatly increased chance of "death or great bodily injury".
In the academy, we were taught that a strike to the brachial plexus origin (side of the neck, just below the ear lobe), even with a hard fist was considered deadly force. If you hit a man there with your fist, you'll probably just knock him out momentarily. If you hit him with the baton, you might kill him. That's a strike you use only when deadly force is authorized.
In the academy, we were taught that a strike to the brachial plexus origin (side of the neck, just below the ear lobe), even with a hard fist was considered deadly force. If you hit a man there with your fist, you'll probably just knock him out momentarily. If you hit him with the baton, you might kill him. That's a strike you use only when deadly force is authorized.
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
PawPaw's House
- D5CAV
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am
Re: Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
No kidding?
I used to get these for free!
FM21-150 http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/360716767440?lpid=82
The US Army did not teach boxing per the Marquis of Queensbury's rules. "Hits below the belt" were encouraged. "Kicking a man when he was down" was part of the training.
Lethality was the whole point of the exercise.
I used to get these for free!
FM21-150 http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/360716767440?lpid=82
The US Army did not teach boxing per the Marquis of Queensbury's rules. "Hits below the belt" were encouraged. "Kicking a man when he was down" was part of the training.
Lethality was the whole point of the exercise.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
I imagine the dead guy had his head beat against something like the ground. On a nice lawn, no problem. On rocks or pavers or pavement? Dead guy.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
- Aglifter
- Posts: 8212
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am
Re: Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
Pretty easy for a strong enough man/trained man to just beat someone to death with his hands/knees/elbows.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor
A gentleman unarmed is undressed.
Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
A gentleman unarmed is undressed.
Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
- Yogimus
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:32 am
Re: Proof Unarmed Combat CAN Be DEADLY (Lethal Force)
This is why I tell my boys "Go get your issues out in the garage, and if you assholes hit each other in the face, I am charging you both with assault.