Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

The place to talk about personal defense, preparedness, and survival; both armed and unarmed.
Post Reply
User avatar
SeekHer
Posts: 2286
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:27 am

Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by SeekHer »

Brought to your attention by: KNOW THY ENEMY™©

E-mail Blog report received from:
The Tactical Wire sponsored by Bushmaster

*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*
Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine
By Rich Grassi

April 20, 1999, a pair of high school students became mass murderers. Their names, already too well known, won't be repeated here. Their victims caused a rethinking of basic police tactics, those tactics learned hard from the massacre at Newhall CA and in a hundred other places since the dawn of policing in America.

What we'd learned, by the time I got on the job in the 1970s, was not to get in a hurry. Have good approach tactics. Create situational dominance. If a problem is localized, contain it. Establish perimeters. Communicate. Along comes 1999.

Columbine was localized. Establishing a perimeter and securing the scene allowed nothing but continued carnage. Well, after the fact, it was decided that the first cops arriving at a scene get together and go in. While that vastly oversimplifies Active Shooter Response, it gives you an idea. I argued against it with all the standard objections, favoring tactics we'd had for years. Since then, ASR has been used a number of times with good results.

In this edition, the day after the Columbine Anniversary, I'd caution a few things about Active Shooter Response - probably things that are already covered, but nevertheless important to reinforce along the way.

First, establish an entry point on the target structure and broadcast it. Anything entering the structure from another direction cannot by definition be us and is, therefore, a likely live-fire target. If a team's inside, stay away from entry and exits, preferably in a cover position. If someone approaches to go in, use verbal control tactics, but don't approach. If they go in, notify the team that a bogey went in and identify the entry point used.

Next, don't follow an entry team unless they know you are following. If they approve, you now have responsibility of the area in the rear: six o'clock. If you get tied up treating or evacuating casualties, let the team know their six is no longer covered.

Have gear ready for resupply; ammo, restraints, trauma gear, chem light sticks, water - anything they may need. Again, everything goes in through the point of entry. If we're opening another point of entry, we're going to need someone to control traffic to minimize blue-on-blue gunfire.

In advance of an event, understand this: if your agency SWAT trains 8 hours a month, chances are slim that the team or component(s) of the team will be first in on an active shooter incident. The more likely responder will be patrol people - possibly process, warrants, detectives and most likely, School Resource Officers. If SWAT gets 8 hours training per month in preparation, first responders should be training at least eight hours a month on Active Shooter Response.

This includes entries, searches, distance shooting, shooting on the move, immediate action drills for firearms and traumatic emergencies - etc.

It's not a cheap investment. An investment it is. Failure to prepare your people for more of these events could lead to the oft-threatened criminal and civil penalties - or more important, having to face the parents of those dead children.
There is a certain type of mentality that thinks if you make certain inanimate objects illegal their criminal misuse will disappear!

Damn the TSA and Down with the BATF(u)E!
Support the J P F O to "Give them the Boot"!!
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Aglifter »

I still think a better choice would be for the states to have full-time SWAT/HRT teams that can be kept in a "ready" status, and be dispatched by helicopter.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 14007
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Netpackrat »

Aglifter wrote:I still think a better choice would be for the states to have full-time SWAT/HRT teams that can be kept in a "ready" status, and be dispatched by helicopter.
Unless they happen to be airborne over the city where the incident is occurring, it will still be over by the time they can get there. And the last thing we need is another militarized police force, particularly one that just sits around ready to be dispatched at a moment's notice. I guarantee they will be used on raids, etc.

Edit to add: Also, you'd be totally abandoning any element of surprise that responders might otherwise have working in their favor. The sound of a helicopter would simply broadcast to the bad guys that it's time to hole up in a defensible part of the building, and/or begin whatever grand finale they may have planned.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Vonz90 »

Aglifter wrote:I still think a better choice would be for the states to have full-time SWAT/HRT teams that can be kept in a "ready" status, and be dispatched by helicopter.
....and then they have to use it so that they can justify the cost, and then it starts getting used for minor stuff that should be done by just knocking on the door and talking to the people inside, and then bad things start happening......
User avatar
Aaron
Posts: 1252
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:27 pm

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Aaron »

The only way to combat mass shooters, minimizing casualties, is the same as it always has been, someone already on the scene has to to take the shooter down. The mass shooting incidents only go to prove the axiom, "When every second counts, the police are only minutes away," to be true in the extreme.

Unless and until, people can get over their hoplophobic indoctrination, the body count will just continue to rise.
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom,...Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you...; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

-Samuel Adams

Irate Islander
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Aglifter »

Vonz90 wrote: ....and then they have to use it so that they can justify the cost, and then it starts getting used for minor stuff that should be done by just knocking on the door and talking to the people inside, and then bad things start happening......
That was kinda my idea about switching to a centralized HRT -- it would be fairly difficult to deploy them on a trivial basis (by reducing the number of "teams" available, their use would be restricted to more difficult situations -- and they could handle those difficult situations better.)

I'm not sure how much of a "surprise" element a SWAT team has - I would think that by the time a local one gathers it's equipment, etc, there's already a hostage situation/some other difficulty.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
Dedicated_Dad
Posts: 2810
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:46 pm
Location: Behind Enemy Lines

Re: Editor's Notebook: Tactics Since Columbine

Post by Dedicated_Dad »

I had a discussion with a Deputy in an area which shall be unspecified for obvious reasons... We were discussing the fact that I'd taught my kids to resist -- "if you're going to die, die on your feet, not cowering under your desk, watching him execute your friends and waiting for him to get to you."

He assured me that such concerns were groundless -- "as soon as we have 3 LEOS on scene, we're going in." I asked him how long he thought it might take to get 3 LEOs to such rural school settings, and if he would wait for 2 friends if some sicko was shooting up HIS kid's school. His utter lack of response was very, very telling...

That all sounds great to those who don't think, or to those who've never played paint-ball or done any sort of tactical gaming or training. My girls told me they'd run - I took them to the range and proceeded to draw a smiley face -- crooked, but clearly recognizeable -- at ~75 feet. I drilled them on some things I'd recommend to any and every one:

* how to recognize the sounds of a reload in progress with their back turned/eyes closed
* how to stop and think for a moment in every location "what can I use for a weapon? What could I use for cover (as opposed to concealment)? What can I throw at his face to make him duck?"

It takes only a few seconds to scan a room and formulate a plan in your head... When we're in a theater (for example) I've asked "What would you do if some nut-bag came in that door..." Getting them to game out a tactic is a worthwhile exercise, and playing "what if" makes them think...

Another surprisingly effective strategy is to put your hand up (in a "stop!" signal) in front of the bbl. Try this sometime with an air-soft pistol and a friend -- numerous anecdotes indicate this has saved a number of lives because the shooter will instinctively try to maneuver around the hand he could much more easily simply shoot through, wasting precious seconds and giving the "victim" a chance at disarming him... While I wouldn't recommend this as anything but a last-ditch effort, it certainly beats waiting!!

I know it's been posted here before, but Chris's post on "when to resist" should be required reading...

DD
workinwifdakids wrote:MV Gun Counter: "We're like Blackwater, except without the impulse control."
Random Internet Moron wrote: "High Caliber Magazine Clips are only useful for random slaughter of innocent civilians, so they should only be used by the police."
Post Reply