The 40 to 50 'youths' were black and the victim was 1/2 white, 1/2 native american, however, police say "the attack wasn't racially motivated".
I wonder what the police would say about an attack by 40 or 50 white youths on a black victim?
A reason to carry 17 round mags
- D5CAV
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
only if the guy would be justified doing the same for himself.Precision wrote:Great, beat up a guy who is already working a full plate without proper utensils.
Its bad enough if they try to jump one of us (fairly fully functional). But terrorizing someone who is physically, emotionally or mentally handicapped is just SO wrong. I guess it goes, under they know they can't properly fight back (have a gun). Bastards.
In Florida, the law says I can still use deadly force (as a bystander) to save the disabled guy.
Can you in your state?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- skb12172
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
Anybody read the Ft. Wayne newspaper article a little farther down? An hour after they beat that man, they gathered nearby raising a rucus and broke a window in a house. When the homeowner fired at them (hitting nobody) they let the mob go free and arrested the homeowner.
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.
- martini
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:12 pm
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
That is fucking criminal. As for LA we support the use (out side of New Orleans) using deadly force in protection of others. The only qualification is that the person you are defending would have the legal right to defend themselves, they need not have the ability. As for beating a handicapped person, I strongly support creating 40 or 50 new cripples, shortly before creating 40 or 50 new corpses.skb12172 wrote:Anybody read the Ft. Wayne newspaper article a little farther down? An hour after they beat that man, they gathered nearby raising a rucus and broke a window in a house. When the homeowner fired at them (hitting nobody) they let the mob go free and arrested the homeowner.
Justice Sotomayor, States may have grown accustomed to violating the rights of American citizens, but that does not bootstrap those violations into something that is constitutional. — Alan Gura
- Combat Controller
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5190
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
Well, my AK decided the matter with 8 guys and not a shot was fired.
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.
- Jered
- Posts: 7859
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am
Re: A reason to carry 17 round mags
CombatController wrote:Well, my AK decided the matter with 8 guys and not a shot was fired.
They were fookin with the Irish mob.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.