the forced disarming of Baghdad
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: the forced disarming of Baghdad
since our supreme court has declared that owning firearms for self defense at home is a human right (not a US right)... wouldnt that mean that it should apply all over the world? at least in the eyes of the US military?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- g-man
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: the forced disarming of Baghdad
In the states it would be no question. Not just no, hell no. Here it's a moral dilemma. A huge part of the "Tribal Awakening" was facilitated because the people HAD guns. I still haven't really figured out how someone would go about getting a new gun, as there are no gun stores... But everyone around here damn sure has an old one.
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
- Aglifter
- Posts: 8212
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am
Re: the forced disarming of Baghdad
It's quite clear, in the opinion of the FF, that the right to defend yourself was a right, inherent to all men... Unfortunately, that hasn't been part of our foreign policy for quite some time... hell, we have diplomatic relations w. nations like Saudi Arabia, who's gov't officials throw girls into fires for not wearing their veils...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor
A gentleman unarmed is undressed.
Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
A gentleman unarmed is undressed.
Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto