The Gun Counter

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... ocid=ientp

In Tennessee, they had vaccines. Friends of the nomenklatura got it before people who needed it because of "mistakes."

I figure all that anybody needs to know about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, can be inferred from the fact that the medical types who get to decide who gets it and when, have reserved all of the initial production for themselves and their own people. These ones in Tennessee are only taking that practice to its logical conclusion, and were not smart enough to avoid getting caught at it.

Here in Alaska the state legislature tried to give themselves priority but thus far have been told to stfu.

I use the same reasoning as with computer software that has been released early. I don't want to have to pay to be a beta-tester.
Every elected official that is either officially associated with the Dems or identifies with them should be first in line. Every last one, from Harris, Pelosi, Biden, on down through all the governors to the non-partisan hacks in City Councils, and all those leftist judges for whom it is "unseemly" to give a party affiliation.

Windy Wilson wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:45 am I use the same reasoning as with computer software that has been released early. I don't want to have to pay to be a beta-tester.
Every elected official that is either officially associated with the Dems or identifies with them should be first in line. Every last one, from Harris, Pelosi, Biden, on down through all the governors to the non-partisan hacks in City Councils, and all those leftist judges for whom it is "unseemly" to give a party affiliation.

Umm. They pretty much are. That is the complaint, they are jumping to the head of the line..

Vonz90 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:56 am Umm. They pretty much are. That is the complaint, they are jumping to the head of the line..

Isn't government health care awesome?

The fact that there is a caution for women of child bearing age not to become pregnant for up to 1 yr after taking the vaccine should say something.............

Jered wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:34 pm

Vonz90 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:56 am Umm. They pretty much are. That is the complaint, they are jumping to the head of the line..

Isn't government health care awesome?

Yes, in exactly the way you mean it.

Termite wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 3:43 pm The fact that there is a caution for women of child bearing age not to become pregnant for up to 1 yr after taking the vaccine should say something.............

Likely as a CYA for the vaccine producer since their initial testing would have (rightfully) not have that demographic represented in their study population, thus the actuaries and lawyers strongly advising that they (Pfizer, Modena) advise against getting pregnant. Because thalidomide worked out so very well...

Not implying it's anything like Thalidomide, just that they have no clue, and since they did such a bang-up job previously, they're actually trying to learn from that.

Vonz90 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:56 am Umm. They pretty much are. That is the complaint, they are jumping to the head of the line..

Good it's an entirely new type of vaccine(mRNA) that was rushed to market, and had the stringint FDA testing that's usually performed on vaccines, waived.

Let them be the guinea pigs and if, say half them drop dead, then it's no real loss.

g-man wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 5:56 pm

Termite wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 3:43 pm The fact that there is a caution for women of child bearing age not to become pregnant for up to 1 yr after taking the vaccine should say something.............

Likely as a CYA for the vaccine producer since their initial testing would have (rightfully) not have that demographic represented in their study population, thus the actuaries and lawyers strongly advising that they (Pfizer, Modena) advise against getting pregnant. Because thalidomide worked out so very well...

Not implying it's anything like Thalidomide, just that they have no clue, and since they did such a bang-up job previously, they're actually trying to learn from that.

I do not work on that field, but I know on the field I am in it is common to include warranty disclaimers that we know no one or few will follow just to limit liability. So it seems likely.