De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Jered »

“And unless the military is fully mobilized and we create something we’ve never had before, which is some kind of national enlistment of medical personnel moved to the most urgent needs in the country constantly … if we don’t have that we’re going to see hospitals simply unable to handle so many people who could be saved.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... oronavirus

Sounds more like he wants conscription and forced relocation of medical professionals.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
User avatar
MiddleAgedKen
Posts: 2873
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Flyover Country

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by MiddleAgedKen »

Of course he does, the miserable Stalinist POS.

My more accurate thoughts of HizzDubiousOnner fall into the category *types...deletes*.
Shop at Traitor Joe's: Just 10% to the Big Guy gets you the whole store and everything in it!
User avatar
scipioafricanus
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:08 pm

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by scipioafricanus »

Bet they miss Rudy now.
If there is a Stairway to Heaven, is there an Escalator to Hell?
If God wanted men to play soccer, he wouldn’t have given us arms. - Mike Ditka
User avatar
scipioafricanus
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:08 pm

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by scipioafricanus »

"Fears Of Social Order Breakdown In NYC As Burglaries Nearly DOUBLE, NYPD Calling In Sick"

https://youtu.be/_Ncaol5zYEQ
If there is a Stairway to Heaven, is there an Escalator to Hell?
If God wanted men to play soccer, he wouldn’t have given us arms. - Mike Ditka
User avatar
randy
Posts: 8352
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: EM79VQ

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by randy »

Of course he does. Because all of the important people live in NYFC, only their needs are important and nowhere else counts. Same as with Coumo's little rant a week or so ago when he found that NY was getting a portion of the ventilator stockpile, not everything as some were going to places not NY (I would have said other States but I'm not sure he gets that concept). Sucks to be on the receiving end of triage, deal with it.

I wonder how many New Yorkers (particularly the ones in "the City") realize the outpouring of support and rage at AQ after 9/11 from Flyover Country was in spite of the fact that NYFC was the target, not because of it. (i.e. we were pissed and rushed to help because those were Americans that were attacked, where they lived was irrelevant).
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Vonz90 »

Jered wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:51 pm
“And unless the military is fully mobilized and we create something we’ve never had before, which is some kind of national enlistment of medical personnel moved to the most urgent needs in the country constantly … if we don’t have that we’re going to see hospitals simply unable to handle so many people who could be saved.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... oronavirus

Sounds more like he wants conscription and forced relocation of medical professionals.
That was kind of done in WW2 some things. My grandfather was technically working for the army as a railroad engineer although he was doing the same job at the same place he worked before the war started.
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Termite »

He can want in one hand, and pee in the other; see which fills up sooner.

Last time I checked, it takes an act of Congress to re-start the draft.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
Langenator
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Langenator »

And Selective Service would have no idea who one their list are actually doctors, nurses, etc.

Actually, the number of nurses whose names are in the draft database has got to be really small, since most nurses are women, and women don't register for the draft.

So it wouldn't be a bill to crank up the draft as it exists, it would have to be a bill to require the registration of medical personnel (MD, PA, RN, NP, LPN, etc) and then 'draft' them.
Fortuna Fortis Paratus
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Jered »

Hilariously, there's actually some lawsuit against male-only selective service that's going on right now or has recently concluded.

Someone suggested that they require women to register for the draft.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Langenator
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: De Blasio Wants "Enlistment" Relocation of Medical People

Post by Langenator »

Yeah, that was as a result of The Lightbringer administration opening all the ground combat arms to women. Since the justification for the draft was mainly that it was needed to put bodies in the infantry (especially infantry), armor, artillery, and combat engineers, and when Selective Service was enacted, those were male only (along with Navy combat ships, AF combat planes, and more I"m sure I'm forgetting), since all those allow women now, women should be subject to Selective Service.

Interestingly, by the mid to later stages of WWII, the draft was being used as much as a manpower/talent allocation tool (voluntary enlistment was stopped at some point, but I forget exactly when) than as a simple tool to put bodies in the ranks. This was mainly at the behest of the (ground) Army and Marines, because the Navy and Air Corps were skimming off all the top tier service eligible men by getting them to volunteer for what was seen as a cushier, less hazardous form of service. (Don't tell that to 8th AF bomber crews up til early 1944, or submariners. But being Air Corps ground crew, or any form of surface Navy service was definitely less hazardous and less arduous than being in a ground combat branch of the Army or Marines. Yeah, being on a destroyer crew in the north Atlantic convoys probably wasn't much fun, but you had a dry bunk, mostly hot meals, and a pretty low casualty rate.)
Fortuna Fortis Paratus
Post Reply