Pittsburgh: '95 case may prompt mayoral veto of gun measure

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
Post Reply
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Pittsburgh: '95 case may prompt mayoral veto of gun measure

Post by 308Mike »

Linkarooni
'95 case could prompt mayoral veto of gun measure
By Jeremy Boren
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Wednesday, December 10, 2008

A 13-year-old settlement between a gun club and Pittsburgh officials could be a factor in whether Mayor Luke Ravenstahl vetoes legislation that would penalize gun owners who don't promptly report lost or stolen weapons.

The Allegheny County Sportsmen's League agreed in 1995 to drop a lawsuit challenging a city ordinance banning assault weapons in exchange for an agreement signed by former City Solicitor Howard J. Shulberg. The agreement says the city would abide by state Act 85, which regulates firearms.

The state law prohibits cities from regulating "lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms."

More of this story..............
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: Pittsburgh: '95 case may prompt mayoral veto of gun measure

Post by mekender »

so they are going to honor a court settlement, but not state law?

what the hell is wrong with these people?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
cu74
Posts: 1633
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:35 pm

Re: Pittsburgh: '95 case may prompt mayoral veto of gun measure

Post by cu74 »

mekender wrote:so they are going to honor a court settlement, but not state law?

what the hell is wrong with these people?
Well, they ARE politicians............
Jim Dozier - Straight, but not narrow...
“A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition.” - Rudyard Kipling.
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Pittsburgh: '95 case may prompt mayoral veto of gun measure

Post by HTRN »

mekender wrote:so they are going to honor a court settlement, but not state law?

what the hell is wrong with these people?
Because all a lawsuit to enforce state law would do is force them to abide by PA's preemtion law.

The other lawsuit, however, very likely has some stiff financial penalities, likely suing the municipalitie for damages..


HTRN
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Post Reply