NJ: Targeting Gun Rights Instead of Criminals: S1774 is Bad

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
Post Reply
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

NJ: Targeting Gun Rights Instead of Criminals: S1774 is Bad

Post by 308Mike »

Linkarooni
Targeting Gun Rights Instead of Criminals: S1774 is a Bad Dose of Old Medicine
Posted by Scott L. Bach, Esq. December 03, 2008 9:06AM
Categories: Hot topics, Law & order, Policy watch, Politics

Now that the Supreme Court has confirmed that the Second Amendment protects the individual citizen's right to own handguns, it's time for public officials to start prescribing a new antidote for gun crime: target violent criminals who actually misuse handguns, instead of passing scattershot laws with toxic side-effects like disarming victims, bullying honest gun owners, and demonizing firearms themselves.

Unfortunately, a bill pending in the State Senate and up for committee vote 12/8 (S1774) is a bad dose of old medicine. It's a proposal to ration the Constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to own handguns beyond the existing regulatory thicket, which already slows exercise of those rights to a trickle. It ignores violent behavior and known sources of illegal trafficking, instead restricting only persons investigated and pre-certified as acceptable to own firearms. Even mainstream media recognize the ineffectiveness of this approach.

More of this story..............
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
Post Reply