Yeah, you're right. I screwed the Pooch on that one.Termite wrote:Dorner was the ex-LEO shooting other LEOs in Kali, not the kid in NJ that shot up the school.PawPaw wrote:That asshole (I will not use his name) stole his mother's guns then shot her in the face. That doesn't sound like a loophole to me.Windy Wilson wrote:I wonder if Dorner bought any weapon used in his murder rampage through one of those loophole laws?
Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
- PawPaw
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:19 pm
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
Dennis Dezendorf
PawPaw's House
PawPaw's House
- Windy Wilson
- Posts: 4875
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:32 am
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
Aw, don't worry about it, I would have been clearer had I used quotes around "Loophole".PawPaw wrote:Yeah, you're right. I screwed the Pooch on that one.Termite wrote:Dorner was the ex-LEO shooting other LEOs in Kali, not the kid in NJ that shot up the school.PawPaw wrote: That asshole (I will not use his name) stole his mother's guns then shot her in the face. That doesn't sound like a loophole to me.
The use of the word "but" usually indicates that everything preceding it in a sentence is a lie.
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
- Windy Wilson
- Posts: 4875
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:32 am
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
From that list I have a lot of thank you letters to write.
And a thought. These laws came up so fast, in the midst of hypocritical pleas to not politicize the deaths. The Communist thugs (No more gentle epithet fits) were hoping that Sandy Hook Elementary would be their Dunblane, and everyone was well-trained enough to turn everything in, even if it didn't currently fall under their new ban, just because it was "for the children"
--If you define "children" as those people in govenment who control or want to control everything.
Sandy Hook is the equivalent of some Government official wanting to pass laws to take my car because some drunk on Interstate 90 plowed into a bus full of school children, launching it over a cliff and there was another auto accident with fatalities earlier in Colorado.
And a thought. These laws came up so fast, in the midst of hypocritical pleas to not politicize the deaths. The Communist thugs (No more gentle epithet fits) were hoping that Sandy Hook Elementary would be their Dunblane, and everyone was well-trained enough to turn everything in, even if it didn't currently fall under their new ban, just because it was "for the children"
--If you define "children" as those people in govenment who control or want to control everything.
Sandy Hook is the equivalent of some Government official wanting to pass laws to take my car because some drunk on Interstate 90 plowed into a bus full of school children, launching it over a cliff and there was another auto accident with fatalities earlier in Colorado.
The use of the word "but" usually indicates that everything preceding it in a sentence is a lie.
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
-
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
IIRC, he claimed to have obtained at least one full auto using a false address in NV for the NFA paperwork.Termite wrote:Dorner was the ex-LEO shooting other LEOs in Kali, not the kid in NJ that shot up the school.PawPaw wrote:That asshole (I will not use his name) stole his mother's guns then shot her in the face. That doesn't sound like a loophole to me.Windy Wilson wrote:I wonder if Dorner bought any weapon used in his murder rampage through one of those loophole laws?
Fortuna Fortis Paratus
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
In Colorado the Californicators are problably going to cause Mapul to leave the state. They display no remorse what so ever at losing the jobs and tax revenue as long as they make their base of Californicator voters happy. Frankly unless they have all died off, I'd be somewhat afraid of those rural area Colorado pro gun types if I were they.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:28 pm
Re: Companies boycotting anti-gun NY
My thoughts exactly.308Mike wrote:I'd much prefer to see these companies refuse to do business with GOVERNMENTAL entities in those states which enact such laws, rather than punish all those gun owners. OTOH, what better way to chastise those folks who put those idiot politicians in office in the first place!
So, I have mixed feelings on them no longer doing business with residents of those numbnut states.