I just discovered there are 70 devout socialists in congress

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
User avatar
Kommander
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am

Re: I just discovered there are 70 devout socialists in cong

Post by Kommander »

Mud_Dog wrote:
CByrneIV wrote:Now, once again, let me state an important political principle.

When you use an argument, or cite a "fact" that you haven't done the research on, you make yourself look like and idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you make a provably false statement, you make yourself look like an idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you cite a known crackpot, you make yourself look like an idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you use a well known discredited or provably false argument, you make yourself look like an idiot and you hurt your own side.

This is why I don't allow people to cite world net daily, Alex Jones, or vdare in this community unless they have at least two other independent and verifiable sources.
Is that too long to make a sig? Probably too long to make an effective bumper sticker. :mrgreen:
Hows this?

"When you use an argument or cite a "fact" that you haven't done the research on, make a provably false statement, cite a known crackpot, or use a well known discredited or provably false argument, you make yourself look like and idiot, and you hurt your own side."

I should add here that I always enjoy getting the other side to do this.
User avatar
Mud_Dog
Posts: 1223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:21 am

Re: I just discovered there are 70 devout socialists in cong

Post by Mud_Dog »

Kommander wrote:
Mud_Dog wrote:
CByrneIV wrote:Now, once again, let me state an important political principle.

When you use an argument, or cite a "fact" that you haven't done the research on, you make yourself look like and idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you make a provably false statement, you make yourself look like an idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you cite a known crackpot, you make yourself look like an idiot, and you hurt your own side.

When you use a well known discredited or provably false argument, you make yourself look like an idiot and you hurt your own side.

This is why I don't allow people to cite world net daily, Alex Jones, or vdare in this community unless they have at least two other independent and verifiable sources.
Is that too long to make a sig? Probably too long to make an effective bumper sticker. :mrgreen:
Hows this?

"When you use an argument or cite a "fact" that you haven't done the research on, make a provably false statement, cite a known crackpot, or use a well known discredited or provably false argument, you make yourself look like and idiot, and you hurt your own side."

I should add here that I always enjoy getting the other side to do this.
Excellent! Thanks Kommander, I'll use that with you paraphrasing Chris! :D

ETA the sig line only allows 255 characters, I'll have to improvise....
Obamalypse, Part II: The Armening. (-NPR)
User avatar
Mud_Dog
Posts: 1223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:21 am

Re: I just discovered there are 70 devout socialists in cong

Post by Mud_Dog »

How's this?
Obamalypse, Part II: The Armening. (-NPR)
User avatar
Mud_Dog
Posts: 1223
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:21 am

Re: I just discovered there are 70 devout socialists in cong

Post by Mud_Dog »

CByrneIV wrote:Nope it was set to 255, I just limited the number of links and images.

I reset it to 512.

If you want to use the line, just attribute it to "The AnarchAngel".
Thanks Chris, I also gave a little thanks to Kommander as well.
Obamalypse, Part II: The Armening. (-NPR)
Post Reply