Boland v. Bonta: Freedom Strikes

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
Post Reply
User avatar
blackeagle603
Posts: 9770
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:13 am

Boland v. Bonta: Freedom Strikes

Post by blackeagle603 »

Aesop reports and add color per usual...
"Californians have the constitutional right to acquire and use state-of-the-art handguns to protect themselves. They should not be forced to settle for decade-old models of handguns to ensure that they remain safe inside or outside the home. But unfortunately, the UHA’s CLI, MDM, and microstamping requirements do exactly that. Because enforcing those requirements implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment, and the government fails to point to any well-established historical analogues that are consistent with them, those requirements are unconstitutional and their enforcement must be preliminarily enjoined. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED."

Eat shit and die, Commie legislature!

The state has 14 days for appeals, after which this injunction is in full force.
RTWT with link to full text of the Preliminary Injunction
"The Guncounter: More fun than a barrel of tattooed knife-fighting chain-smoking monkey butlers with drinking problems and excessive gambling debts!"

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic;" Justice Story
Precision
Posts: 5268
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: Boland v. Bonta: Freedom Strikes

Post by Precision »

well good. faster and harder.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
Post Reply