Soccer WNT Lawsuit

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
Post Reply
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Soccer WNT Lawsuit

Post by Vonz90 »

“The history of negotiations between the parties demonstrates that the WNT [women's national team] rejected an offer to be paid under the same pay-to-play structure as the MNT [men's national tea“The history of negotiations between the parties demonstrates that the WNT [women's national team] rejected an offer to be paid under the same pay-to-play structure as the MNT [men's national team], and the WNT was willing to forgo higher bonuses for benefits, such as greater base compensation and the guarantee of a higher number of contracted players,” Klausner wrote in his opinion.

“Accordingly, plaintiffs cannot now retroactively deem their CBA [collective bargaining agreement] worse than the MNT CBA by reference to what they would have made had they been paid under the MNT’s pay-to-play terms structure when they themselves rejected such a structure,” he explained.m], and the WNT was willing to forgo higher bonuses for benefits, such as greater base compensation and the guarantee of a higher number of contracted players,” Klausner wrote in his opinion.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/us-women ... ay-lawsuit

Ha ha
Precision
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: Soccer WNT Lawsuit

Post by Precision »

good and hard.
I want what I chose not to have and you will bend to me, because "insert sexist slander here".
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
Post Reply