At least they can get into Hell. We sailors have to stay in Limbo.
Heaven won't let us in because they fear us wrecking the place . Hell denies us entry cause they know we'll take over .
If you are unwilling to give another man freedom in his life, do not expect to have it in your own.
It surely beats trying to figure out what the metrosexuals want ( a good hard kick in the nuts in my opinion, but that won't sell ice cream :D )- Highspeed
Dub_James wrote:Back on topic again
Will it be used as an excuse to say "Look, see? You don't need guns in your home, these people are here to protect you!"
Thoughts?
Given the way "that one" talks and acts, this would be my precise fear. As stated in previous posts, what would this force aim to achieve that isn't already covered by an existing agency? I can't help to feel that it would eventually be used as a tool of oppression against the masses.
morsetaper wrote:Given the way "that one" talks and acts, this would be my precise fear. As stated in previous posts, what would this force aim to achieve that isn't already covered by an existing agency? I can't help to feel that it would eventually be used as a tool of oppression against the masses.
+1 Thought the back door.
Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.
Theodore Roosevelt
It doesn't matter whether an official militia is created, or whether it's used as an excuse to circumvent "one potential reading" of the 2nd. The first clause of the 2nd amendment doesn't place any restrictions or requirements on the second, and Heller agrees.
It's entertaining to think of worst case "what if" scenarios, but if it keeps y'all up at night, it's counterproductive. Let the lefties stay up at night worrying that their messiah is gonna go down in flames.
"Luck is where you find it—but to find it you have to look for it" -- Eugene Fluckey. Blogspot picsig
We sailors have to stay in Limbo. 
. Hell denies us entry cause they know we'll take over 
. 
, what are the 2nd Amendment implications of this civilian force?
