Page 1 of 3
Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:21 am
by evan price
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:32 am
by tfbncc
This falls under the "stupid should hurt" category.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:26 am
by PawPaw
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:36 pm
by skb12172
Is there any chance this will come back to bite the Bailiff? I'm guessing not.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:44 pm
by PawPaw
skb12172 wrote:Is there any chance this will come back to bite the Bailiff? I'm guessing not.
Not sure where the video was made, but I'm guessing not. The one thing I'd have done differently is to verbalize my intent to arrest. (One of the basic rules around here is that you can't use force unless you intend to arrest.) So, tell the guy he's under arrest, then tag him if he doesn't immediately comply.
Arrest him for what, you might ask? Again, I'm not sure of the jurisdiction, but around here, Disturbing the Peace is a catch-all. Other statutes might apply, or even local ordinances, if there are ordinances about video cameras in the court room.
I'm pretty sure that wherever the bailiff was, he was confident that he was on firm ground.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:13 pm
by toad
The camera critter was lucky it wasn't pepper spray or worse yet a baton. In some of the smaller poor Texas districts it would have been cuffs used as knuckle dusters and/or a pistol whipping. The bailiff's are going to do what the judge wants, it is up to law suits to correct the judge not some self inflated twat with a camera, and if the judge doesn't want a camera in his court to say protect identities and/or avoid violating someone's civil rights, then I don't see the camera critter as having any standing or right to bull doze a bailiff. As soon as the twat stated he was intending to push the bailiff aside then in a lot of jurisdictions it would have been game on.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:47 pm
by BDK
Didn't watch the video but if he was filming against the judge's instructions... Well, contempt charges/force should be expected.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:53 pm
by Rod
BIG sign at 27 seconds that says no cell phones. If he was using his cell to tape that, BOOM! He's violating an order of the court. If he was using the camera, most news sources are first accredited, then they MAY be allowed to video tape under certain circumstances. Since he wasn't press, tough luck Charlie. Zap away.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:10 am
by Yogimus
Idon't give a fuck what law or jurisdiction you "recognize" motherfucker, I am the man with the gun.
Re: Sovereign Citizen has his day in court...wait for it
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:14 am
by skb12172
PawPaw wrote:skb12172 wrote:Is there any chance this will come back to bite the Bailiff? I'm guessing not.
Not sure where the video was made, but I'm guessing not. The one thing I'd have done differently is to verbalize my intent to arrest. (One of the basic rules around here is that you can't use force unless you intend to arrest.) So, tell the guy he's under arrest, then tag him if he doesn't immediately comply.
Arrest him for what, you might ask? Again, I'm not sure of the jurisdiction, but around here, Disturbing the Peace is a catch-all. Other statutes might apply, or even local ordinances, if there are ordinances about video cameras in the court room.
I'm pretty sure that wherever the bailiff was, he was confident that he was on firm ground.
It was Idaho.