Trying to keep your merchant fleet in being artificially with the Jones act is like trying to curb inflation with price controls. There will just be no shipping at all, and air freight to Alaska (and eventually smuggling) just like price controls lead to empty shelves and eventually the only market is the black market.Vonz90 wrote:Relative to the Jones Act, there are definitely some down side and the U.S. domestic shipping industry is over regulated, but there are a lot of actual decent reasons for it in a general sence.
I would rather see deregulation and favorable tax treatment and keep the Jones act rather than keeping the regulations and ditching the act. Unless of course fighting the next war with no US merchant ships sounds like a good idea.
How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
The Jones Act doesn't hurt just Alaska it also hurts domestic shipping on both the lower 48 continental coasts. By requiring overpriced shipping rates, traffic moves instead on trains, trucks, and aircraft. So now days not much in the way of specialized coastal ships gets built. Port cities don't have the advantage they used to have over interior cities that aren't near navigable rivers. Small costal ports don't see the near the shipping they should be getting.
Both ship building and heavy freight shipping gets hurt by the Jones act.
I vaguely remember a science fiction story in which fixed route shipping gets killed by shipping craft that could float over land or water at high speeds.
Both ship building and heavy freight shipping gets hurt by the Jones act.
I vaguely remember a science fiction story in which fixed route shipping gets killed by shipping craft that could float over land or water at high speeds.
- Netpackrat
- Posts: 14002
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
Yes, this. The total number of Jones Act compliant ships in the entire US merchant marine fleet is less than 100.Greg wrote:Trying to keep your merchant fleet in being artificially with the Jones act is like trying to curb inflation with price controls. There will just be no shipping at all,Vonz90 wrote:Relative to the Jones Act, there are definitely some down side and the U.S. domestic shipping industry is over regulated, but there are a lot of actual decent reasons for it in a general sence.
I would rather see deregulation and favorable tax treatment and keep the Jones act rather than keeping the regulations and ditching the act. Unless of course fighting the next war with no US merchant ships sounds like a good idea.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati
"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
- HTRN
- Posts: 12403
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
You can buy a working container ship for less.Old Grafton wrote:Too bad we can't talk UPS into converting a retired aircraft carrier into a really BIG Brown Truck....
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
-
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:07 am
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
I just joked about aircraft carriers because they're built in US shipyards and (hopefully) made of US steel. Heck, I doubt you could even find enough people to wade through all the government regulations banning their re-purposing and re-use.HTRN wrote:You can buy a working container ship for less.Old Grafton wrote:Too bad we can't talk UPS into converting a retired aircraft carrier into a really BIG Brown Truck....
I'm not old--It's too early to be this late.
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
I had this sudden vision of heavy lift helicopters flying off the carrier, taking cargo containers back and forth. Fresh crabs for San Francisco and old hippies for bait in Alaska.
- AlaskaTRX
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:37 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
The crab wouldn't taste very good if that's what you want to feed them...toad wrote:I had this sudden vision of heavy lift helicopters flying off the carrier, taking cargo containers back and forth. Fresh crabs for San Francisco and old hippies for bait in Alaska.
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
I was thinking more in terms of bait for Bears. Of course that might not be a large enough market. Also come to think of it if you want a case of crabs San Francisco probably has more than enough cases of crabs.
- Vonz90
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
... and it would go up if we reduced the regulation and tax burden on the domestic shipping, which is what I just said we should do (because it would be cheaper to run domestic shipping).Netpackrat wrote:Yes, this. The total number of Jones Act compliant ships in the entire US merchant marine fleet is less than 100.Greg wrote:Trying to keep your merchant fleet in being artificially with the Jones act is like trying to curb inflation with price controls. There will just be no shipping at all,Vonz90 wrote:Relative to the Jones Act, there are definitely some down side and the U.S. domestic shipping industry is over regulated, but there are a lot of actual decent reasons for it in a general sence.
I would rather see deregulation and favorable tax treatment and keep the Jones act rather than keeping the regulations and ditching the act. Unless of course fighting the next war with no US merchant ships sounds like a good idea.
If you keep the over regulation and get rid of the Jones Act you will get "0" domestic ships because everyone will just switch to flags of convenience.
Total US merchant fleet = 450 ships (all types, not just cargo)
Total US owned ships which fly other flags = over 1000.
Most of the western owned ships are not too bad, but you have no idea how crappy many companies will allow their ships to get and how crappy many of the crews are. But the main reason that companies foreign flag is costs, primarily crew costs (as most of the western big companies take reasonable care of the their ships). Operating costs for US ships can be 65% higher and that does not even count the favorable tax treatment which most countries give their merchant fleet but we don't.
The Jones act is not the problem. I'm sure a Mexican trucking company with Mexican drivers following Mexican safety regulations could operate cheaper and drive down cargo rates on the East Coast too, do you want that? It is the same thing.
I will say it again, the problem is not the Jones Act, it is regulation which makes the cost of operating US shipping prohibitive for many uses.
BTW - to get out of the Jones Act when shipping to AK, all one would need to do is reload in a Canadian port. I am pretty sure the driver for the AK shipping costs is volume as in general sea borne shipping rates have been rather suppressed lately.
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: How to reduce Alaska freight costs?
Actually I think it's both.
The real problem is the regulatory and tax burden, I agree. The only way to fix the situation is to undo the awful regulatory and tax situation.
The Jones Act is an attempt at a fix, but it's the wrong fix and it does in fact make things worse. Getting rid of the Jones Act would at least make it possible to get freight into and out of Alaska without paying exorbitantly. But as you said, it would have the effect of outsourcing shipping. If you don't care about US flagged shipping and all you care about is shipping freight to and from Alaska, it's a sufficient fix.
If you care about having a US flagged merchant fleet, the only real solution is to improve the tax and regulatory situation such that having your ships be US flagged isn't punitive.
The real problem is the regulatory and tax burden, I agree. The only way to fix the situation is to undo the awful regulatory and tax situation.
The Jones Act is an attempt at a fix, but it's the wrong fix and it does in fact make things worse. Getting rid of the Jones Act would at least make it possible to get freight into and out of Alaska without paying exorbitantly. But as you said, it would have the effect of outsourcing shipping. If you don't care about US flagged shipping and all you care about is shipping freight to and from Alaska, it's a sufficient fix.
If you care about having a US flagged merchant fleet, the only real solution is to improve the tax and regulatory situation such that having your ships be US flagged isn't punitive.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr