A Colorado Air Crash

If it doesnt fit anywhere else but you still want to share, this is the place
User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5190
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: A Colorado Air Crash

Post by Jericho941 »

The appeal of the autogyro in the embedded image is made up entirely of the prospect of eventually meeting St Peter and saying "Honestly, what could Hell have to offer me by way of punishment that I haven't already suffered by being caught dead in this thing?"
MarkD
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: A Colorado Air Crash

Post by MarkD »

Something I just noticed, from the picture above. How do these things keep from spinning? Helicopters have a tail rotor for that purpose, what keeps the fuselage from following Newton and spinning in the opposite direction from the rotor? If I had to guess I'd think the rotor was very light weight, so the rudder could counteract the force of the spin (since I'm also assuming they can't hover like a helicopter).
User avatar
Captain Wheelgun
Posts: 1133
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:31 am
Contact:

Re: A Colorado Air Crash

Post by Captain Wheelgun »

MarkD wrote:Something I just noticed, from the picture above. How do these things keep from spinning? Helicopters have a tail rotor for that purpose, what keeps the fuselage from following Newton and spinning in the opposite direction from the rotor? If I had to guess I'd think the rotor was very light weight, so the rudder could counteract the force of the spin (since I'm also assuming they can't hover like a helicopter).
The rotor is not powered, so there is no torque to turn the fuselage.
"What is this, the Congress Avenue Independence Day Parade?" - Capt. Karl von Stahlberg, RTN
Republic of Texas Navy Archives
MarkD
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: A Colorado Air Crash

Post by MarkD »

Captain Wheelgun wrote:
MarkD wrote:Something I just noticed, from the picture above. How do these things keep from spinning? Helicopters have a tail rotor for that purpose, what keeps the fuselage from following Newton and spinning in the opposite direction from the rotor? If I had to guess I'd think the rotor was very light weight, so the rudder could counteract the force of the spin (since I'm also assuming they can't hover like a helicopter).
The rotor is not powered, so there is no torque to turn the fuselage.

:shock: :o

When I have some time to spare I have to look into how those things work.

From the ground.

And anyone who tries to get me INTO one will have to knock me out with a ball peen hammer first.
User avatar
SoupOrMan
Posts: 5696
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:58 am

Re: A Colorado Air Crash

Post by SoupOrMan »

Yep, the rotor provides lift completely through autorotation.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."

“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
Post Reply