ALTERNATIVE HISTORY
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:34 am
Just posted about some WW2 alt hist in Whatya Reading, Redeux?
We all know that if it wasn't for the intervention of the USA into WW2 the outcome would have been totally different--I probably wouldn't be here writing this.
WW1 was a different matter as the influx of AEF was definitely helpful it didn't really turn the tide of the war as to outcome just duration.
America, at the onset of the WW2 was supplying both sides in Europe--mainly raw materials to the Axis and finished goods and raw materials to the Allies until that fateful day in December when Pearl Harbour was attacked.
I'm wondering what would have happened if Japan didn't attack at all and just concentrated on the ANZAC, Indian and British troops in the Far East and India or had done so much later into the conflict, say 1944 or 1945 after they controlled most of the Pacific, I don't think they would have allowed the territories of Wake or Hawaii to remain unconquered -- probably annexing them from the USA instead of an actual attack.
Would the USA have gone to the support of the Allied forces, again, or remained neutral? FDR knew of the plight of the Jews in concentration camps and ghettos (turned away a few "survivor" ships from entering US ports) but really didn't care much about them being the [mild] anti Semite that he was.
Of course the outline of the list of battles would have been different if they did go in and there have been many who've speculated that FDR would probably have declared war against Germany & Italy in late 1942 but almost for sure not against the Japanese as warring on two fronts does not make for good military sense...It is probable that the Japanese wouldn't have declared against the USA when and if they declared against the other Axis powers.
We all know that if it wasn't for the intervention of the USA into WW2 the outcome would have been totally different--I probably wouldn't be here writing this.
WW1 was a different matter as the influx of AEF was definitely helpful it didn't really turn the tide of the war as to outcome just duration.
America, at the onset of the WW2 was supplying both sides in Europe--mainly raw materials to the Axis and finished goods and raw materials to the Allies until that fateful day in December when Pearl Harbour was attacked.
I'm wondering what would have happened if Japan didn't attack at all and just concentrated on the ANZAC, Indian and British troops in the Far East and India or had done so much later into the conflict, say 1944 or 1945 after they controlled most of the Pacific, I don't think they would have allowed the territories of Wake or Hawaii to remain unconquered -- probably annexing them from the USA instead of an actual attack.
Would the USA have gone to the support of the Allied forces, again, or remained neutral? FDR knew of the plight of the Jews in concentration camps and ghettos (turned away a few "survivor" ships from entering US ports) but really didn't care much about them being the [mild] anti Semite that he was.
Of course the outline of the list of battles would have been different if they did go in and there have been many who've speculated that FDR would probably have declared war against Germany & Italy in late 1942 but almost for sure not against the Japanese as warring on two fronts does not make for good military sense...It is probable that the Japanese wouldn't have declared against the USA when and if they declared against the other Axis powers.