Page 1 of 3

Death of the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:21 pm
by staylor
I used to watch the History Channel all of the time for intelligent insight on historical fact.
I began to get worried when they started to branch outside of history, but not too much.
I grew more worried when reality TV and Monster Quest made their debute and a started to watch the channel far less.
Then they started climbing on the Global Warming bandwagon and began to abandon the channel all together.
I still watched the occasional program and they still had a few interesting shows but largely I had switched to Discovery.
It was not till today though that the History Channel has officially jumped the shark for me and probably drove me away for good and it is all thanks to the special '2100'. This program was puported to show probably senarios over the next century and was thinking that it could have been a take on "The Next 100 Years" which is an excellent book on geopolitics.
Instead it turned out to be a giant liberal wetdream that looked to have been written by the Obama Adminisration. The show fortold the disasters of the next century that would arise from the libs favorite catastrophes; Global Warming, Peak Oil, Sixth Extinction and Overpopulation all made an appearance. the experts backing up the conclusions included Van Jones and Robert Hanson. In the fictional narrative that provided structure to the program the bad guys included corporations and implied conservatives; the good guys were liberals, young radicals, New York, the UN and of course Obama.
Normally I would turn such crap off but this show was so over the top and so unintentionally funny I just couldn't. I am almost tempted to record the whole show just so I could post a line by line fisking on YouTube.
Naturally, Global Warming and its associated woes was the star of the show, its like the people who made this show have been in a coma for the last few years. They repeatedly brought up things that have been directly debunked in the last couple of years; Himalayan Glacial melting and Global warming born Hurricanes were both prominently featured :roll: .
With this pile of crap, History Channel has finally lost me for good. They are full time drinkers of the liberal coolaid and I will no longer watch them.

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:28 pm
by 308Mike
Is THAT what I saw on the channel when flipping through that had some kind of cartoon thing about New York city flooding during storms, and how the city is such a bastion of hope and humanity?

GAG!

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:45 pm
by staylor
Sounds like it, the show is still running as I post this. I did have to finally turn it off as unintentional humor can only count for so much.

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:07 pm
by 308Mike
Yeah, but right now they have an interesting show on about how the earth was made, and they're researching the Siberian Traps (giant lava flows).

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:28 pm
by George guy
The only hope for civilization if the SHTF is with the people with the capability to restart it out of their basements.

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:44 pm
by SoupOrMan
Yeah, they pooh-poohed my pitch for a new show. "Persia: Alexander The Great's Tackling Dummy." I had to tone it down to "Tackling Dummy" because "Prison Bitch" caused the Prison Bitches Union to complain after the initial screening.

Re: Death if the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:22 pm
by randy
Meh, depends on the show. Dogfights, Battle 360, etc still rock. R Lee is always entertaining. I pick and chose by the program.

Which is why I've quit watching broadcast TV except for local weather and occasional PBS shows. It's so rare to find a worthwhile program on network TV it's not worth the 2 extra button pushes on the remote to switch from the sat.

Remember, as a general rule, TV is entertainment first and history second,if at all.

Re: Death of the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:36 pm
by rightisright
Yeah, they pooh-poohed my pitch for a new show. "Persia: Alexander The Great's Tackling Dummy." I had to tone it down to "Tackling Dummy" because "Prison Bitch" caused the Prison Bitches Union to complain after the initial screening.

Bwahahahahahha!

Re: Death of the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:55 am
by The Quiet Man
Remember, as a general rule, TV is entertainment first and history second,if at all.
While this is true, I still see where staylor is coming from. Sadly the History Channel has turned from a channel that relied heavily on history for it's programming to awful reality based shows and complete make believe. It is still called the "History Channel" afterall. It would be like the Playboy Channel showing Barney or reruns of Queer Eye For The Straight Guy.

Re: Death of the History Channels credibilty.

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:24 am
by Darrell
I like Modern Marvels and the R. Lee Ermey stuff, that's about it.