EU Agency tells banks to assume all PCs are infected
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:53 pm
https://www.theguncounter.com/forum/
https://www.theguncounter.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=19257
Well yeah, isn't that the current proportion that have ms windows on them?mekender wrote:Realistically, they probably are... I would bet at least 80% of the ones on the internet have SOMETHING on them malicious.
On that note, how secure is the browser encryption that kicks in when you log in to your bank's website? Though I know nothing about information security, I'm afraid the answer is "not very".CByrneIV wrote:I've been telling my clients the same thing for years.
As of now, I fully and firmly believe that the only possible future model for information security is untrusted client, untrusted network, untrusted transport, with securely authenticated access.
But then again the reality is that you are still much more likely to have someone steal your wallet or your receipts from your trash than you are to have them intercept a transaction like that.CByrneIV wrote:The encryption itself, IF PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED AND MANAGED (particularly if properly patched when vulnerabilities are found) is actually pretty secure.Frankingun wrote:
On that note, how secure is the browser encryption that kicks in when you log in to your bank's website? Though I know nothing about information security, I'm afraid the answer is "not very".
IF properly implemented and managed.
At BOTH ends, and the middle.
The problem is, there are so many other vulnerabilities, that it makes the strength of the encryption irrelevant. It's far easier to just compromise the session or the data, in one of a hundred other ways.