SmartPhones

Discussion of all things technological and/or gadgety
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Greg »

CByrneIV wrote:
Greg wrote:
CByrneIV wrote:My wife and I both have Motorola droid Bionics. We love them.
Nice phones. But that model only came out 2 months ago, what'd you have before? I seem to remember you've gone through a number of phones and had some interesting things to say along the way....
Before that, we both had Droid X's which we also generally loved. Before that we both had iPhone 3gs's; which again, in general, we both loved.

The biggest issues we had with the iPhone were actually with AT&T. If Verizon had the iPhone at the time we moved (we moved to an area with no AT&T data service), we may have stayed with it; though we do prefer the freedom and options that Android offers.

We absolutely love the Android platform. We both strongly prefer it to the iPhone; however, we are also both advanced users who don't need the simpler interface and smoother UI experience that the iPhone offers. We're willing to trade those positives, for the extra options and flexibility that Android gives.
Thanks. Glad to hear that last bit.

It's funny, only 1 of my good friends has an Android phone- she's got an Evo Shift. She *hates* it. But she's weird. She's an MIT graduate who, believe it or not, *hates* (fears and loathes, really) computers. I think she should have gone with an iPhone, and she probably will now that Sprint has them. Whenever I borrowed her phone, I enjoyed it. Looking forward to the options and flexibility.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
Rich Jordan
Posts: 1840
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Rich Jordan »

In case anyone is interested; the CarrierIQ software embedded on many mobile phones is back in the news.

Slashdot post

Long Video showing CarrierIQ logging everything
Rich Jordan
Posts: 1840
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Rich Jordan »

Aaaand there we go. Its in iPhones too but snoop features disabled by default (diagnosticsallowed disabled):

CarrierIQ in Iphone too
Rich Jordan
Posts: 1840
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Rich Jordan »

More fun. Just the slashdot link this time (the articles are linked from there). Popular and 'default' Android apps on Motorola, HTC, and Samsung exploitable. Google reference builds are either not or less exploitable so it appears to be the carrier/vendor specific changes.
User avatar
Jeffro
Posts: 495
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:17 pm

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Jeffro »

CByrneIV wrote:And its not on verizon phones apparently... though frankly I'm sure Verizon is snooping in other ways.
I just installed the app to find out - Voodoo Carrier IQ detector - and it says my phone is clear. Although I agree with ya, Chris. I'm sure there is some other way Verizon is keeping tabs.
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.

Shane
User avatar
308Mike
Posts: 16537
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: SmartPhones

Post by 308Mike »

Jeffro wrote:
CByrneIV wrote:And its not on verizon phones apparently... though frankly I'm sure Verizon is snooping in other ways.
I just installed the app to find out - Voodoo Carrier IQ detector - and it says my phone is clear. Although I agree with ya, Chris. I'm sure there is some other way Verizon is keeping tabs.
As long as you're traveling across their network, they're going to know where you're going and what sites are responding to your requests (until you throw a couple of anon proxies into the mix and use https, then they'd have no idea who and what you're talking to or about).
POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON

A person properly schooled in right and wrong is safe with any weapon. A person with no idea of good and evil is unsafe with a knitting needle, or the cap from a ballpoint pen.

I remain pessimistic given the way BATF and the anti gun crowd have become tape worms in the guts of the Republic. - toad
esa5444
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:33 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by esa5444 »

I guess I should sound off too.

Got a Droid Razr recently. Love it. The build quality is high, I like Motorola's design, and I think the amount of crapware on this phone is pretty low, at least compared to HTC.

As for privacy, I think if you are concerned that big companies or the gub'ment might be snooping on you, you should stick to a payphone. A lot of the features that make smartphones smart are things that require them to collect data. On top of that, the network always knows which cell you are in, and likely with all these phones having GPS and Wi-Fi location detection, they can probably find you very quickly. They know who you call, they know how much data you are using. The phones know where they have been, and there is so much information flying between the phone and the network that, well, let's say if you value your privacy more than the features of a smartphone (or really a regular phone), you shouldn't have one.
Nicodemus
Posts: 359
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Nicodemus »

esa5444 wrote:if you are concerned that big companies or the gub'ment might be snooping on you, you should stick to a paypy a regular phone), you shouldn't have one.


This...but keep in mind you can still be tracked to intersection at the least and address at the worst on a pay phone...both will have a time stamp.
esa5444
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:33 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by esa5444 »

Nicodemus wrote:
esa5444 wrote:if you are concerned that big companies or the gub'ment might be snooping on you, you should stick to a paypy a regular phone), you shouldn't have one.


This...but keep in mind you can still be tracked to intersection at the least and address at the worst on a pay phone...both will have a time stamp.
When it comes to privacy online/on the phone, I worry more about the companies we deal with. The government has some restrictions on what info it can collect and what it can do with it. When user LoveToCrap, however, posts every bowel-movement he's had on his Twitter, he is sending this information, of his own volition, to Twitter, and they can do with it any damned thing they want.
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: SmartPhones

Post by Aglifter »

esa5444 wrote:I guess I should sound off too.

As for privacy, I think if you are concerned that big companies or the gub'ment might be snooping on you, you should stick to a payphone.
My father would never discuss important business matters over the phone - something he was taught by his, and a habit from when operators could, and did, listen in.

Then, in the days of when a scanner could pick-up a cell phone conversation, again, you never discussed anything important.

And now, apparently, again, you shouldn't discuss business over a cell-phone..
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
Post Reply