DIY IR Thermal Suit

The place for general talk about gun, shooting, loading, camping, survival, and preparedness related tools and gear, as well as gear technology discussion, gear reviews, and gear specific "range reports" (all other types of gear should be on the back porch).
Post Reply
User avatar
D5CAV
Posts: 2428
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am

DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by D5CAV »

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
User avatar
JustinR
Posts: 1852
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:53 am

Re: DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by JustinR »

So...BIT here... Why not outfit fatigues (with hookups for boots, gloves, and headwear) with an inner layer of cheap thermal blanket, followed by a system of small water tubing, which would draw the heated water to a thermoelectric plate and convert the waste heat to electricity to run the water pump (and possibly charge batteries or power devices depending on efficiency achieved), thus reducing heat signature and cooling the user without a big bulky gillie suit type cloak that keeps heat in?

Thermoelectric efficiency is based on temp difference between the two sides of the plate, but if you're in a desert environment during the day you have to blend with surrounding temperatures more than hide excess heat. Batteries could provide individual cooling, reducing fatigue. At night, the system would work as normal to reduce thermal signature. In a cold environment, you're going to be completely covered already, and batteries could be used with alternative fluids that won't freeze to provide whole body heating.

Thoughts?
"The armory was even better. Above the door was a sign: You dream, we build." -Mark Owen, No Easy Day

"My assault weapon won't be 'illegal,' it will be 'undocumented.'" -KL
Aesop
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am

Re: DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by Aesop »

A not-insignificant number of the guys we worked with on the CA border had day jobs and advanced degrees working for companies like Hughes, Litton, and FLIR.
And had the time, inclination, and spare funds to look at the problem of detecting people crossing over, both from a hobbyist point of view, and with an eye on at-work applications for same.
You can defeat thermal with a wet suit.
Or by smearing your naked body with mayonnaise.

Neither is practical for most normal applications under field conditions. :P

For those, nothing more complicated than a large throw rug is necessary.

And I defer to the hardcore physics guys, but the problem with a dedicated suit is that TANSTAAFL; you can move the heat, but you can't remove the heat. No matter what you devise, something's going to be hot, and show up. You can change the profile from a human body shape, but you'll just make the new signature the pump/machinery/a large rectangular cold spot/whatever.

Also, both rocks and trees are significantly warmer than the background environment under thermal observation. So whatever you devise, if it moves, hot or cold, it'll be detected, be identified as not-a-rock-or-tree, and then if appropriate, ventilated with appropriate amounts of lead/steel/expanding nitrate-based gasses. At which point the heat signature will assume room temperature, but you won't care because you'll be dead.

People with vast budgets have tried and are trying to crack this. Even if they come up with something, the entity observing will merely change to a different part of the spectrum, or combine multiple spectrums simultaneously (there are already dual simultaneous NV/thermal sights commercially available), rendering any such tech a huge waste of effort and investment.

As the USAF learned when illiterates shot an F-117 down with relatively limited resources.

The two best ways to defeat observation is to either go where there isn't any, or blind/kill the observers. Pretty much perpetually.
The rest is mainly toys for geeks, and rent money for the Dr. Emmett Browns of the world. NTTAWWT.
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
User avatar
JustinR
Posts: 1852
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:53 am

Re: DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by JustinR »

Aesop wrote:And I defer to the hardcore physics guys, but the problem with a dedicated suit is that TANSTAAFL; you can move the heat, but you can't remove the heat. No matter what you devise, something's going to be hot, and show up. You can change the profile from a human body shape, but you'll just make the new signature the pump/machinery/a large rectangular cold spot/whatever.
Remove, no, but you can change the heat energy into electrical energy, hence the thermoelectric plates, with the side being heated on the inside, the other side on the outside of the suit exposed to the ambient with a heat sink and fan to keep it close to ambient, but hidden from direct line of sight with a shroud. The real question is whether such a system would be able to collect enough of the body heat to allow an individual to blend in with the underbrush when not moving, and have the thermal efficiency to convert the heat to electricity without causing the outside of the plate and heat sink to become, as you said, a small but intense hot spot. I'd have to do more research and perhaps buy a small thermoelectric plate to outfit to a glove with water tubing to test the viability. Because it's fun. :)
"The armory was even better. Above the door was a sign: You dream, we build." -Mark Owen, No Easy Day

"My assault weapon won't be 'illegal,' it will be 'undocumented.'" -KL
Precision
Posts: 5268
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by Precision »

JustinR wrote:
Remove, no, but you can change the heat energy into electrical energy, hence the thermoelectric plates, with the side being heated on the inside, the other side on the outside of the suit exposed to the ambient with a heat sink and fan to keep it close to ambient, but hidden from direct line of sight with a shroud. The real question is whether such a system would be able to collect enough of the body heat to allow an individual to blend in with the underbrush when not moving, and have the thermal efficiency to convert the heat to electricity without causing the outside of the plate and heat sink to become, as you said, a small but intense hot spot. I'd have to do more research and perhaps buy a small thermoelectric plate to outfit to a glove with water tubing to test the viability. Because it's fun. :)
I would like to subscribe to this newsletter. I am interested from a technical as well as practical stand point.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: DIY IR Thermal Suit

Post by Greg »

JustinR wrote:
Aesop wrote:And I defer to the hardcore physics guys, but the problem with a dedicated suit is that TANSTAAFL; you can move the heat, but you can't remove the heat. No matter what you devise, something's going to be hot, and show up. You can change the profile from a human body shape, but you'll just make the new signature the pump/machinery/a large rectangular cold spot/whatever.
Remove, no, but you can change the heat energy into electrical energy, hence the thermoelectric plates, with the side being heated on the inside, the other side on the outside of the suit exposed to the ambient with a heat sink and fan to keep it close to ambient, but hidden from direct line of sight with a shroud. The real question is whether such a system would be able to collect enough of the body heat to allow an individual to blend in with the underbrush when not moving, and have the thermal efficiency to convert the heat to electricity without causing the outside of the plate and heat sink to become, as you said, a small but intense hot spot. I'd have to do more research and perhaps buy a small thermoelectric plate to outfit to a glove with water tubing to test the viability. Because it's fun. :)
Suspect thermodynamics is not your friend here.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
Post Reply