Options to think about.
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 9:33 pm
I had posted back in the Ye Olde Rifle thread about an Aero M5 lower I picked up on sale recently. For those that don't know, Aero does a daily item of 10-15% off if you're on their mailing list, along with other specials. I'd figured on a long, slow build to a 6.5 Creedmoor using this method. I also wanted to do the 6.5C simply because they manufacture a 6.5C upper in house.
Then I started thinking.....
I have a Rem 700 LTR I purchased back around 1999-2000. This was well before the Cerberus buyout. It shoots better than I can. When I've locked it down into a sled it overlaps holes. It is, however, a heavy .308 with a short 20" barrel. I put a Leupold MK IV LR/T 10x on it, sitting in Valdada steel rings and a 20 moa inclined base. It's a good setup for 600 yards and under. The mildot reticle was the hotness at the time.
The thing is, this rifle isn't doing anything my FN SPR can't already do except taking up space in the safe.
I'm figuring the stock, trigger, buffer parts (wanted to go with JP Silent Springs on this one), and misc parts for the M5 would run $700 for the lower alone, along with another $700-800 for the upper, and another $1,200 for glass and mounts. $2,600 is quite a bit of scratch, not to mention the initial cost of the lower.
A new Rem 700 barrel, along with a truing of the receiver, would likely cost less by quite a bit. I don't shoot this rifle much at all, so several months at somewhere like GA precision getting a new barrel and trigger won't hurt me.
If I do that, the question I find myself asking is, why 6.5C? .260 Rem becomes a good option with some real advantages. Primarily, the conversion of .308 brass of which I have literally buckets of on hand. I can get a little more speed out of the .260 rem. I can afford to go with a barrel maker that produces high quality barrels by not spending wildly on the M5. I can switch the MK IV over to the FN and replace the Springfield Gov scope it came with and top the LTR with something more modern.
I'm not really seeing a downside. Any thoughts?
Then I started thinking.....
I have a Rem 700 LTR I purchased back around 1999-2000. This was well before the Cerberus buyout. It shoots better than I can. When I've locked it down into a sled it overlaps holes. It is, however, a heavy .308 with a short 20" barrel. I put a Leupold MK IV LR/T 10x on it, sitting in Valdada steel rings and a 20 moa inclined base. It's a good setup for 600 yards and under. The mildot reticle was the hotness at the time.
The thing is, this rifle isn't doing anything my FN SPR can't already do except taking up space in the safe.
I'm figuring the stock, trigger, buffer parts (wanted to go with JP Silent Springs on this one), and misc parts for the M5 would run $700 for the lower alone, along with another $700-800 for the upper, and another $1,200 for glass and mounts. $2,600 is quite a bit of scratch, not to mention the initial cost of the lower.
A new Rem 700 barrel, along with a truing of the receiver, would likely cost less by quite a bit. I don't shoot this rifle much at all, so several months at somewhere like GA precision getting a new barrel and trigger won't hurt me.
If I do that, the question I find myself asking is, why 6.5C? .260 Rem becomes a good option with some real advantages. Primarily, the conversion of .308 brass of which I have literally buckets of on hand. I can get a little more speed out of the .260 rem. I can afford to go with a barrel maker that produces high quality barrels by not spending wildly on the M5. I can switch the MK IV over to the FN and replace the Springfield Gov scope it came with and top the LTR with something more modern.
I'm not really seeing a downside. Any thoughts?