22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

The place for general discussion about guns, gun (and gun parts) technology discussion, gun reviews, and gun specific range reports; and shooting, training, techniques, reviews and reports.
BDK
Trigger Junkie
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:14 am

22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby BDK » Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:25 am

8 shot for the J frame, and 10 shot in the N frame.

Mainly, it'll be for new shooters/perhaps for doing some steel challenge. Any thoughts on the two?

Greg
Probably Unemployed
Posts: 8088
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: MO

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby Greg » Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:28 am

I have a 4" 10 shot 617, but it's an L frame (er, no, K frame, but it's similar in size and weight to the L frame 686. Full underlug, heavy.). I love it.

The main downside is, it's heavy. But that also makes it very steady, and reduces recoil to really negligible levels. So the weight isn't purely a downside. Well except if you're carrying it all day.

I'd like to try a J frame plinker, but never have.

Just guessing here, but I'd probably prefer the J frame as a trail gun for fun while hiking, and the bigger one at the range.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr

BDK
Trigger Junkie
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:14 am

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby BDK » Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:37 pm

I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame

MarkD
Active Shooter
Posts: 3800
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby MarkD » Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:54 pm

BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame


617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.

Johnnyreb
Case Shiner
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:02 am
Location: Not in Texas

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby Johnnyreb » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:39 am

I picked up a nice plinker a little while back. Heritage Rough Rider single action. Fun little 6 shooter that came with 2 cylinders for .22lr and .22 magnum. Took it to the range twice so far. A fair amount of fun for 200 bucks.

Rich Jordan
Trigger Junkie
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:04 am

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby Rich Jordan » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:13 am

My Dad had an H&R Sportsman 999, 9-shot top break. It was quite accurate, and a very fun gun, and I learned to shoot a handgun with it.

Unfortunately it was stolen by a 'caregiver' and so far not recovered; when time allows I'm going to try and find another.

User avatar
HTRN
Probably Unemployed
Posts: 10713
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:05 am
Location: Under your bed with a knife
Contact:

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby HTRN » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:53 pm

MarkD wrote:
BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame


617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.

In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation. :ugeek:
EGO partum , proinde EGO sum

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Greg
Probably Unemployed
Posts: 8088
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: MO

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby Greg » Sun Jan 14, 2018 11:56 pm

HTRN wrote:
MarkD wrote:
BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame


617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.

In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation. :ugeek:


So you're on record as a fan of the single-shot revolver. :lol:
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr

MarkD
Active Shooter
Posts: 3800
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby MarkD » Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:38 am

Greg wrote:
HTRN wrote:
MarkD wrote:
BDK wrote:I stank corrected. I thought the 617 was on the N frame


617 is a K frame. I have a six shot version with 6" barrel, it shoots it's got eyes of it's own.

In theory, the six shot version is more accurate due to fewer chambers and therefore less chamber variation. :ugeek:


So you're on record as a fan of the single-shot revolver. :lol:


I get that you're kidding, but it's not uncommon for people who use revolvers for Bullseye to figure out which of their Chambers throws a flyer and use the other five. I never got good enough that it mattered.

User avatar
HTRN
Probably Unemployed
Posts: 10713
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:05 am
Location: Under your bed with a knife
Contact:

Re: 22 revolver for plinking 3" J frame vs 4" N Frame

Postby HTRN » Mon Jan 15, 2018 2:07 am

Another common trick is to chase all the holes in the cylinder with a reamer the thinking is that any tight chambers will be opened up..
EGO partum , proinde EGO sum

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum


Return to “Guns and Shooting”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests