USS Fitzgerald

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
toad
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by toad » Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:57 am

Color me superstitious but I don't think I'll be getting on a ship with Fitzgerald in the name. I think it is just because the song keeps running through what is left of my brain, "The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald ".

User avatar
Jericho941
Posts: 5146
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Jericho941 » Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:09 am

http://www.businessinsider.com/this-sai ... ald-2017-6
The Fitzgerald was struck below the waterline, and Rehm Jr.'s family was told by the Navy that he went under and saved at least 20 sailors, according to WBNS-10TV in Columbus, Ohio.

But when he went back down to get the other six sailors, the ship began to take on too much water, and the hatch was closed, WBNS-10TV said.

"That was Gary to a T,” Rehm Jr.'s friend Christopher Garguilo, told NBC4i in Columbus, Ohio. “He never thought about himself.”

"He called [the sailors on the ship] his kids," his uncle, Stanley Rehm Jr., told The Daily Beast. “He said, ‘If my kids die, I’m going to die.’”

User avatar
skb12172
Posts: 7211
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by skb12172 » Wed Jun 21, 2017 12:37 pm

Jericho941 wrote:http://www.businessinsider.com/this-sai ... ald-2017-6
The Fitzgerald was struck below the waterline, and Rehm Jr.'s family was told by the Navy that he went under and saved at least 20 sailors, according to WBNS-10TV in Columbus, Ohio.

But when he went back down to get the other six sailors, the ship began to take on too much water, and the hatch was closed, WBNS-10TV said.

"That was Gary to a T,” Rehm Jr.'s friend Christopher Garguilo, told NBC4i in Columbus, Ohio. “He never thought about himself.”

"He called [the sailors on the ship] his kids," his uncle, Stanley Rehm Jr., told The Daily Beast. “He said, ‘If my kids die, I’m going to die.’”

Dusty in here all of a sudden. Damn it. RIP, Sailor.
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.

User avatar
D5CAV
Posts: 1998
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:48 am

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by D5CAV » Wed Jun 21, 2017 5:36 pm

Vonz90 wrote:It doesn't matter, a DDG has enough ass to get out of the way of / avoid any freighter in open ocean. If I had been OOD, I cannot say that I would have been expecting something like this, but I have seen enough weird shit from foreign merchant* men that the watch teams are always keeping an eye on them, especially if they are CBDR.

* they know that Navy ships will maneuver around them, so they sometimes just keep going even if they are the give way vessel.
+1

This.

+ other ships aren't allowed to have the kind of radars that US Navy ships have. At best, the container ship had a couple of $20,000 Furuno radars, and was probably on auto pilot.

Perhaps the skipper was not aware that there was nobody watching any of those super-top-secret, $10 million special US Navy radar sets made by some US defense contractor at 2am.

Perhaps the skipper was not aware that it was common practice to slack off and play cards after he went to bed.

The skipper shouldn't be worrying about his career. He should be worrying about manslaughter charges in his court martial.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Langenator
Posts: 906
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Langenator » Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:02 pm

Human error, especially in judging the crossing or overtaking bearing. See this from War on the Rocks: https://warontherocks.com/2017/06/how-c ... ns-at-sea/

The big thing that gets me, and what might get into negligent manslaughter (or whatever the UCMJ calls it) is why were crewmembers still in their berthing areas, apparently unaware? Why wasn't the collision alarm sounded? Even if the collision had still occurred, might the loss of life have been avoided if the bridge watch had sounded the collision alarm?

Was the CO notified? If so, why was he still in his cabin/stateroom? If not, why not, and what were the standing orders for alerting the captain? (I'm not Navy, but I've been a watch officer in battalion, brigade, and corps level operations centers. There is ALWAYS a list of things you wake up the CO for.)

My (landlubber) guess, from looking at the damage photos is that it was an overtaking situation, with the container ship overtaking the Fitz from the Fitz's starboard side. Now, which ship was the Give Way ship is the question, and I can't really tell from the photos that have been released. My guess is that, if the Fitz was going faster than the container ship, the Fitz was probably the give way ship. If the container ship was going faster, it might well have been the give way ship.

I'm sure the investigation will hash all of this out. But it will take time, and until then all we can do is speculate.
Fortuna Fortis Paratus

User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 3256
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Vonz90 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 1:56 am

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/26 ... -says.html

I am a former Surface Warfare Officer for those who don't know. I do not what happened, but this sounds like utter BS. Ships do not react that quickly compared to a car or whatever, but 10 minutes are a long time non the less. This sounds like spin, especially as the relative damage suggest that they hit the Fitz with their bow on the Fitz's starboard side.

Looking at the damage, and the fact that the Fitz could out maneuver any merchant ship if she wanted - my guess is that the Fitz was overtaking the merchant on the merchant's port side (the normal way to do it). That made the Fitz the give way vessel. In that case the stand on vessel (the merchant) is required to maintain steady course/speed. They were probably not looking behind them and did not realize that they were being overtaken. They got to a predetermined way point (or for some other reason) they turned to port as the Fitz coming up abeam of them - then boom.

From the bridge of the Fitz at night, you would not see the change in aspect very quickly. They should have had someone on a repeater tracking the ship they were overtaking constantly (in CIC too), still they would pick it up pretty quickly if they were doing it anywhere close to right. If you see the move quickly enough, you just turn to starboard, pass port to port then turn to port and pass astern of them. If it is found out late, the DDG can go fast quick, the right action in that case would be to turn to port and hit ahead flank emergency - however - a lot of OOD's get "left is dead" burned into their brain - which has its application but is a bad thing to have stuck in your brain when it is the right thing to do.

So, apropos of nothing, but that is my guess. The merchant screwed up, and the DDG was not paying close enough attention to catch it / react in time.

User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 12564
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Netpackrat » Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:22 am

Thanks for the analysis, that seems to make sense.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Ass-op

Langenator
Posts: 906
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Langenator » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:19 am

Nevermind that what the merchant's captain is saying - that they signalled and were turning to avoid - is almost completely at odds with what at least one outside analyst said earlier - that, based on the known course track, the container ship was likely running on autopilot, either with nobody on the bridge, or the bridge watch asleep.

Who is more likely to be blowing smoke: the outside analyst with no skin in the game (other than his reputation for being right or wrong, where being wrong means he doesn't get called next time something like this happens), or the captain of one of the ships involved, who has every incentive to try to cover his ass?
Fortuna Fortis Paratus

User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 3256
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by Vonz90 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:26 pm


User avatar
blackeagle603
Posts: 8981
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:13 am

Re: USS Fitzgerald

Post by blackeagle603 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 6:58 pm

It is to weep, from these things we learn (and relearn). One the Nav does well as a rule is lessons learned applied to casualties and DC efforts.
"The Guncounter: More fun than a barrel of tattooed knife-fighting chain-smoking monkey butlers with drinking problems and excessive gambling debts!"

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic;" Justice Story

Post Reply