N. Korean missile fails seconds after launch. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/21/asia/ ... sile-test/
US tests laser weapons?
- randy
- Posts: 8335
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
- Location: EM79VQ
Re: US tests laser weapons?
Possible, but I don't think so. I am unable (or at least unwilling) to get into why I make that assessment.Denis wrote:. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
- Denis
- Posts: 6570
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am
Re: US tests laser weapons?
There you go again, neither confirming nor denying
- Denis
- Posts: 6570
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am
Re: US tests laser weapons?
[tinfoil hat] It occurs to me that the USAF X37-B space plane is aloft at the moment, secretly doing secretive things...[/tinfoil hat]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37#OTV-4
http://www.space.com/9940-secretive-spa ... t-37b.html
http://heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?satid=40651
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37#OTV-4
http://www.space.com/9940-secretive-spa ... t-37b.html
http://heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?satid=40651
-
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:14 pm
Re: US tests laser weapons?
Physics pretty well says no.
A "rod from god" is far more practical, though it would be more destructive, I think, unless quite small.
I know that a nuke can destroy a chemical/biological weapons depot, as the thermal front passes the pressure front - is that inherent to being a nuke, or would a large enough rod be able to do the same thing?
A "rod from god" is far more practical, though it would be more destructive, I think, unless quite small.
I know that a nuke can destroy a chemical/biological weapons depot, as the thermal front passes the pressure front - is that inherent to being a nuke, or would a large enough rod be able to do the same thing?
- Vonz90
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Re: US tests laser weapons?
Atmospheric beam weapons are mostly all short range (that I know of anyway). The diffusion in the atmosphere makes them loose power rapidly. There has been some work on x-ray lasers to get around this, but I do not think they have come up with anything practical.Denis wrote:N. Korean missile fails seconds after launch. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/21/asia/ ... sile-test/
- Denis
- Posts: 6570
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am
Re: US tests laser weapons?
I was indeed also wondering whether the X37-B might not be an experimental Thor platform. The problem would be getting the time on target right, as opposed to a laser/lightspeed weapon. OTOH, I suppose the locations of the NorK's launch testing sites are well known to the USAF.BDK wrote:A "rod from god" is far more practical
- First Shirt
- Posts: 4378
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Re: US tests laser weapons?
Why, Denis! What on earth would make you think something like that?Denis wrote: OTOH, I suppose the locations of the NorK's launch testing sites are well known to the USAF.
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
- evan price
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 am
Re: US tests laser weapons?
Or maybe the Norks don't have better Germans.
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
- HTRN
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: US tests laser weapons?
You forgot the Casaba howitzer option, although theyre not nearly as impressive in orbit to surface applications.BDK wrote:Physics pretty well says no.
A "rod from god" is far more practical, though it would be more destructive, I think, unless quite small.
I know that a nuke can destroy a chemical/biological weapons depot, as the thermal front passes the pressure front - is that inherent to being a nuke, or would a large enough rod be able to do the same thing?
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt