Because, fundamentally, they don't know what to do. They really have no real idea where to go from here, so, like Hollywood, they're going with a sequel.JustinR wrote:The real question is why the USAF is wasting the money for very little improvement over the B-2. As Langenator said, they should be collaborating with NASA on building a SABRE engine bomber, something that would be transformational rather than a waste of resources.
USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
- Mike OTDP
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:42 pm
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
LRS-B is designed to a technology base about 30 years more advanced than the B-2. Though I agree that the USAF has probably overrated LO, undervalued performance. One good thing about the F-22 is that supercruise knocks missile engagement envelopes back considerably.
Of course, I would not take any artist's conception as 100% accurate at this time. Wait until we see hardware.
Of course, I would not take any artist's conception as 100% accurate at this time. Wait until we see hardware.
- MiddleAgedKen
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
- Location: Flyover Country
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Second look at SLAM? (No, I'm not going to let this go. Why do you ask?)Langenator wrote:If traditional F-117/B-2/F-22/F-35 stealth loses effectiveness, you basically have three options:
1) Go in low and fast to reduce target acquisition times and use terrain masking. May also be used in conjunction with what used to be called 'Wild Weasels' to knock back defenses.
2) Go high and REALLY fast. I'm thinking SR-71/XB-70 mixed with B-2+.
3) Standoff with long range missiles of some sort.
Best I've been able to tell, the USAF seems to want to continue to dump most, if not all, of it's eggs into the stealthy basket, without much in the way of Plan B.
Shop at Traitor Joe's: Just 10% to the Big Guy gets you the whole store and everything in it!
- Jericho941
- Posts: 5180
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:30 am
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Here, I'll throw you my tumblr nonsense.
USAF: We need a successor to the B-2
Northrop Grumman: we gotchu covered fam
Northrop Grumman: *writes B-2 on a whiteboard*
Northrop Grumman: *adds a 1*
USAF: FUND THIS IMMEDIATELY
-
- Posts: 6149
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Yeah, the change in reality from the "artist's conception F-19" to the reality of the F-117 always comes to mind.Mike OTDP wrote:Of course, I would not take any artist's conception as 100% accurate at this time. Wait until we see hardware.
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
- randy
- Posts: 8334
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
- Location: EM79VQ
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Then there was the ability of various spokes-critters to claim with absolute honesty that there was no such thing as an F-19 Stealth Fighter being developed. And no such aircraft had ever been deployed to various hot spots in the world years before the -117 was officially brought into the "grey" world.Aesop wrote:Yeah, the change in reality from the "artist's conception F-19" to the reality of the F-117 always comes to mind.Mike OTDP wrote:Of course, I would not take any artist's conception as 100% accurate at this time. Wait until we see hardware.
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
- slowpoke
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:09 pm
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
Hey, heres an idea if they don't know what to do. Replace the fricken Minute Man 3 before it EOL's. Air force should court martial whoever thought of replacing the B2 when they have exactly jack shit to replace one third of our nuclear triad thats 4 years from end of life with no new production scheduled and no program to replace it. Then they could spin up a new warhead because 30 year old warheads dont instill confidence.Greg wrote:Because, fundamentally, they don't know what to do. They really have no real idea where to go from here, so, like Hollywood, they're going with a sequel.JustinR wrote:The real question is why the USAF is wasting the money for very little improvement over the B-2. As Langenator said, they should be collaborating with NASA on building a SABRE engine bomber, something that would be transformational rather than a waste of resources.
"Islam delenda est" Aesop
- randy
- Posts: 8334
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
- Location: EM79VQ
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
I think part of the reason for the delay in ICBM replacement is that there is a group in the 5-sided funny farm that thinks of the Nuclear Triad as "cold war thinking" and thinks that we can get by with SLBMs and cruise missiles, so having to deactivate the Minutemen due to aging out of components is a feature, not a bug.
Of course, the real stupidity in this area was the retirement of the newer Peacekeepers due to slavish adherence to an un-ratified treaty with a country that no longer exists.
Of course, the real stupidity in this area was the retirement of the newer Peacekeepers due to slavish adherence to an un-ratified treaty with a country that no longer exists.
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
- slowpoke
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:09 pm
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
You mean the nuclear cruise missiles we dont have anymore since we finished decomissioning all their warheads a couple years ago?randy wrote:I think part of the reason for the delay in ICBM replacement is that there is a group in the 5-sided funny farm that thinks of the Nuclear Triad as "cold war thinking" and thinks that we can get by with SLBMs and cruise missiles, so having to deactivate the Minutemen due to aging out of components is a feature, not a bug.
Of course, the real stupidity in this area was the retirement of the newer Peacekeepers due to slavish adherence to an un-ratified treaty with a country that no longer exists.
"Islam delenda est" Aesop
-
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 pm
Re: USAF Unveils B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber
I guess they are getting rid of the minutemans by launching them at the marshal islands?