Norks

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Rumpshot
Posts: 3998
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:56 am

Norks

Post by Rumpshot »

It appears they are threatening LA, DC, and Austin, TX.

Choice of targets, 2 out of 3 seem to make sense...

Armchair quarterback time. What are the odds that they can actually hit their targets? That the nukes will actually go bang? How dirty would they be? How large a "kill" zone would each inflict? Would they fling one at each city or multiples?

I was thinking about this in the shower this morning. Don't know how real tech savvy they might be. Would expect one missile per city due to expense/budget issues. I would expect accuracy to be problematic as well as reliability of the payload.

The million dollar question would be what exactly do they expect to gain. Assuming the absolute worst, that they annihilate each target city, they must understand that North Korea would cease to exist. I would expect both China and Russia, unless they are a party to the crime, to stomp just as hard as we do.
NRA Life Member
VFW Life Member
NMLRA Field Rep
North Central Arizona
User avatar
Captain Wheelgun
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:31 am
Contact:

Re: Norks

Post by Captain Wheelgun »

AUSTIN???

WTF, Over ???

There are probably more communists here than there are in North Korea :lol:
"What is this, the Congress Avenue Independence Day Parade?" - Capt. Karl von Stahlberg, RTN
Republic of Texas Navy Archives
User avatar
Dinochrome
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:14 am

Re: Norks

Post by Dinochrome »

I've pondered this, too. It didn't look like the NorKs would be able to successfully launch anything that would reach the U.S.A., but after they actually put up a satellite that achieved polar-orbit I had to reconsider. If you can make orbit, you can hit any spot on the planet.

I still think Kim's missiles are a diversion. He warns, "Watch out for my mighty missiles!" and sends a primitive refrigerator-sized fission bomb to a coastal city in a rusty freighter with a suicide crew. It would just need to get within a half-mile of land. An ocean-surface burst would shower the shore with radioactive seawater and the blast-wave would raise a tsunami. Targets on the west coast could be Seattle in Puget Sound, San Francisco between the bridges, Long Beach inside the breakwater, and San Diego under the Coronado bridge. If Kim III had enough fissionable material and a fleet of innocent-looking commercial ships, he could hit all of them at once and claim his missiles did it.
Last edited by Dinochrome on Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Fair is fair; If somebody tries to kill you, kill them right back."
Captain Malcolm of Serenity
User avatar
Bullspit
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:48 pm

Re: Norks

Post by Bullspit »

Obviously Austin is a target because:

1. Capitol of Texas. After DC is gone Texas will take its rightful place as the center of the new country.

2. Home of a lot of US corporate offices of South Korean businesses? This is just a guess on my part.

3. Un hates Texas blues.
"Stand it like a man, and give some back." Al Swearengen
User avatar
randy
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: EM79VQ

Re: Norks

Post by randy »

What Chris said. Same Shit, Different Day
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: Norks

Post by Aglifter »

If it were real, because those are the towns where the Norkd have operatives w chemical weapons
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
User avatar
bubblewhip
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: Norks

Post by bubblewhip »

I don't think that exactly will stop their great leader from the like of launching one of those things like a Katyusha rocket in the hopes it will hit "something."

This is 3 generations of crazy we're talking about here. Hilariously two of those locations are near the sea and one of them is on land surrounded by a whole lot of nothing. If it even DOES work, There's probably over a 50% chance it will hit some water or desert, and basically a nil chance it will hit anything substantial that is greater than a suburban area

Of course there is more than one way to deliver a nuke.

You could do it by boat, but certainly any military boat will be detected even a sub by the South Koreans and reported back. You could do it by civilian, but that would also be reported by the SK pretty quickly. Military Air is completely out of the picture, it would be completely obvious. Civilian air? Possible, but when I mean possible I mean there is a percent chance or two that you can bounce from NK to China, and to the United States, but completely unlikely because China doesn't want anything to do with NK at this time, hell less of a chance of being partially responsible for sending a bomb to the US.
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 13986
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Norks

Post by Netpackrat »

I don't find myself objecting very strenuously to his target list. Since Alaska is probably one of the places he can actually hit, I'd just as soon he be flinging shit elsewhere, and those are not horrible locations for a little urban renewal. If I could make any revisions to his list, I'd substitute NYC or maybe Sacramento for Austin though.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
randy
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: EM79VQ

Re: Norks

Post by randy »

bubblewhip wrote:and one of them is on land surrounded by a whole lot of nothing.
You haven't been in the Austin area in say, the last 100 years or so, have you?
You could do it by boat, but certainly any military boat will be detected even a sub by the South Koreans and reported back.
No, it's not "certainly". Surface craft, likely, but a ROMEO or WHISKEY class sub is damned hard to detect from what I understand. One of those stripped and provisioned for a one-way mission could reach the US West coast.
You could do it by civilian, but that would also be reported by the SK pretty quickly.
You've got a hell of a lot more confidence in the KCIA than I ever did.
Military Air is completely out of the picture, it would be completely obvious. Civilian air? Possible, but when I mean possible I mean there is a percent chance or two that you can bounce from NK to China, and to the United States, but completely unlikely because China doesn't want anything to do with NK at this time, hell less of a chance of being partially responsible for sending a bomb to the US.
Probably true, but they could always fly in from somewhere else, staging from say Venezuela without having a direct path back to home-base. The host country wouldn't even need to know anything about it.

Point is, the world ain't safe. There's always a way, so I don't waste a lot of time worrying about it. Based on previous experience, the louder Son of Dopey and Grandson of Lumpy postures, the less likely he is to actually do anything. It's when they're quiet you gotta start worrying.
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Norks

Post by Jered »

Isn't he shooting missiles that can miss entire countries? :lol:
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Post Reply