randy wrote:... with certain combinations of munitions and target sets it could be effective with "retail destruction" as well.
As opposed to 'wholesale destruction'? Haha.
Yeah that would be the sunshine in a can.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
My parents' weekend place was somewhat near Camp Shelby in Mississippi. When we first got the place in the early-'80s it was USAFR F-4Es and Navy Reserve A-7Es zipping past at low level. Later it was A-10s and F/A-18s. The 'Hogs were especially impressive. Most unusual thing I saw flying overhead was one of the F-20 prototypes. I heard a jet, looked up & watched what looked like a gray F-5 fly over at low, but not treetop height. Unusual, and therefore cool. As it went past, I saw one big exhaust, instead of two small ones & realized what it really was.
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King
"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
randy wrote:It's called a Loft-Toss. Not the most accurate of deliveries, but for when close counts (nukes, cluster munitions, soft area targets ("soft pudgies in the open")) it can be effective at reducing exposure to the target's defenses. Not just an F-111 delivery method.
I thought loft tossing was mainly done with "physics packages"..
I know that the E model's targeting system was particularly good for such things. The D models used something a little more primitive for iron bombs, yet still to great effect. The F model solved the iron bomb problem with the Pave Tack pod, but that negated the use of the internal munitions bay. I always wanted to see someone make the Pave Tack system smaller so you could mount it elsewhere on the airframe and get the extra space for munitions. Of course I also wanted to see them mount two 25mm Bushmaster-type cannons running down the underside of the plane for strafing the crap out of vehicle convoys, too. But there's no chance of improving it now...
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds
SoupOrMan wrote: Of course I also wanted to see them mount two 25mm Bushmaster-type cannons running down the underside of the plane for strafing the crap out of vehicle convoys, too. But there's no chance of improving it now...
They call that a Tornado.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
The Tornado carries about 12000 fewer pounds of ordnance, though.
Remember, folks, you can't spell "douche" without "Che."
“PET PARENTS?” You’re not a “pet parent.” You’re a pet owner. Unless you’ve committed an unnatural act that succeeded in spite of biology. - Glenn Reynolds