Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

This forum is for discussions on the noteworthy events, people, places, and circumstances of both the past and the present (note: pop culture etc... is on the back porch).
Post Reply
TheArmsman
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:59 pm

Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by TheArmsman » Sat Apr 06, 2019 12:05 am

https://www.thecollegefix.com/school-di ... _25rqhYn8Q



As ol'Kim would put it, this is a RCOB moment.
When death is inevitable, style counts.

Survival trumps programming.

Old Grafton
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:07 am

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Old Grafton » Sun Apr 07, 2019 1:12 am

That siily stuff starts here, Grampaw shows up with a hickory axe handle. "Eff" That.
I'm not old--It's too early to be this late.

Precision
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Precision » Mon Apr 08, 2019 12:33 pm

When the .01% makes the rules for the rest. The society is pretty close to done.
It matters not if the .01% are the ruling class, the trannies or the garbage men. A republic is no longer in existence at that point.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Vonz90 » Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:51 pm

Precision wrote:
Mon Apr 08, 2019 12:33 pm
When the .01% makes the rules for the rest. The society is pretty close to done.
It matters not if the .01% are the ruling class, the trannies or the garbage men. A republic is no longer in existence at that point.
You skipped judges. That is the issue. If it was the local Chicago Mayor and Council doing this, they could be opposed in the next election or at least move to a saner location, but from a judge with federal reach, there is no option.

User avatar
Termite
Posts: 8782
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Termite » Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:42 am

Vonz90 wrote:
Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:51 pm
....... but from a judge with federal reach, there is no option.
Incorrect. There is always an option; at least in this case.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."

Precision
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Precision » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:10 am

Termite wrote:
Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:42 am
Vonz90 wrote:
Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:51 pm
....... but from a judge with federal reach, there is no option.
Incorrect. There is always an option; at least in this case.
He's right you know. There are always options. They may be bad options. You might end up in jail;but there are options.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Windy Wilson
Posts: 4764
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:32 am

Re: Teenagers now have no right to body modesty in school.

Post by Windy Wilson » Tue Apr 23, 2019 8:38 pm

The Preston Brooks/ Charles Sumner option?
The use of the word "but" usually indicates that everything preceding it in a sentence is a lie.
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy

Post Reply